I think I have seen ONE around me that hasn’t been wrapped for a business.
In the last 3-4 months I’ve started seeing lots of CyberTrucks being driven around by construction supervisor/clerk of the works types. All of them are fully covered with wraps promoting their/their companies’ businesses.
As someone who’s had vinyl letters on the car before, this happens to normal cars too...
Metallurgists call it corrosion resistant steel, not stainless, which was more of a trade name for high chromium steel.
Did you watch the video? The F-150 wasn’t exactly stuck when the CT snapped. It was rolling and then hit a big bump.
The legal question of whether or not you can get away with setting traps on your property and injuring an intruder have long been settled, and it doesn’t end well for the homeowner setting the traps.
Booby trapping your property with explosives would likely result in felony charges. Just follow Mark Rober’s lead and make some stink/glitter bomb packages.
In this case, yes, the Turo insurance should cover this, IMHO (but I would not be surprised if they worm their way out of it). The insured is the owner of the truck, they are in the business of renting them, and it’s not like you can vet who is going to decide to be a vigilante with your truck. So Turo should pay out…
The key to successfully using an EV is having the capability to charge at home and then you don’t need a full week’s worth of range in one charge. I have peak/off-peak charging so I charge my iX at night (it takes roughly 8-10 hours) and it costs me roughly $8 for a full charge. So far, I have driven 1,500 miles and…
Well its not that funny, having to haul less fuel improves mileage too. Less dead weight to haul around. Suspect it would most benefit city driving vs highway, not that highway would get no benefit from less weight.
I agree with both of you, though both of you pointed out the solution for avoiding the consequences of a hypothetical situation.
You buy a vehicle and you’re instantly “under water" they are not appreciating assets. This article makes zero sense.
This is like saying X number of people are losing money on their stock portfolio.
It was rotating on it’s anchor line, that is not plowing.
That’s not necessarily true?
I’ll explain the difference between CA and red states like TX. The difference is, in SF there is No Cash Bail. So, if you DO get picked up, you’re booked and released for a misdemeanor. You serve no time, and you go back on the street to do it again - and again - and again.
Which state is more likely to punish misdemeanor shoplifting?
It’s called “satire” and it is intended to point out the ridiculously lenient and laissez-faire attitude that the California legal system has toward crime. Goes to lack of enforcement, not threshold for a misdemeanor.
Ask store owners in California how they feel about the new shoplifting law.