Scientific American is right wing now? Really?

That’s true for many STIs, and with with monkeypox, the virus is transmitted almost exclusively through the sexual networks of gay men.

For the vast majority of people who deal with these diseases, experience them in the communities, the name per se is not a major issue. It’s the weaponization of these names.

You don’t have to go back that far. :(

I think the same thing when I see folks giving Tyson and Kobe a pass.

Tanks are so 20th century.

Newsome has that ‘too rich to be bothered by the poors’ thing going on though.

Here’s the study for anyone who’s interested:

The Navy has such nice uniforms even the JAG officers look good, but pretty much every president for the last 20+ years has worn a bomber jacket at some time.

I’m in the wrong demo for Tate, but Kevin Samuels started showing up in whatever the YouTube version of TikTok is (Shorts?) in my feed about two weeks ago.

Isn’t cleaning up your room one of the first thing Peterson tells kids to do?

I hate these word crimes
Like I could care less
That means you do care
At least a little

I hope they review Ezekiel 23:20.

LTT: “Boston Children’s Hospital is now offering ‘gender-affirming hysterectomies’ for young girls.”

Lots of South Africa, which I’m ok missing.

On a lesser scale, CNN was running this same angle, arguing that a retweet or follow is the same as an endorsement.

Simple minded rube?

I loved the guy. Full disclosure, I also sell purple diamonds for a living.

“In a letter published Monday exclusively on Jezebel ... “

Are you familiar with the work of Candace McDuffie here at The Root?