no* lol
no* lol
She was using her fraudulent background to lend credence to the putter. Her fraudulent background gave it more credence than it otherwise would have gotten.
I agree with you completely.
He is absolutely not responsible. Quite frankly in any way shape form or fashion. He was doing his job. He had every right to say what her name was before having her name changed, thats part of the fraud. And I think it was his responsibility to do just that.
She was using her false background to lend credence to how good the putter was. Without that fraudulent background would she have even had the opportunity to create said putter? Would she have been taken seriously. the most likely answer would be know.
You are further proof that many vegans are mentally unstable. And no. It is not hard to argue against when all those involved are rational and not mentally disabled.
This is the one and only article that needed to be done on the subject. Offering a bounty turned you into TMZ. Since Jezebel has been clueless for the last few days (I am being kind) being compared to TMZ is not at all a good thing.
"hired hacks like Lindy West"
She is the WORST!
My appologies for double posting. I refreshed again and my post showed up.
Actually, really. Not all chefs own their own restaurant. As a matter of fact most don't own their own place. Most are chefs at restaurants that are owned by someone else. Some are executive chefs of entire chains, like say Granite city. After working for a chef of this caliber it makes those chef jobs I mentioned…
No that isnt all it takes. Not every chef owns his own restaurant. As a matter of fact most dont. And when you get hired on to be a chef at someone else's restaurant, or to be the executive chef of their chain, you then DO get paid. You would need even less experience than normal if you worked at the 6th rated…
F that. They are the 6th rated restaurant on the planet. Everyone who understands what that entails and the significance of it couldn't give a rats butt about an "internet circus".
"It should be a high point and well paid position in people's careers- not I once worked at one of the greatest restaurants in the world for basically free. "
Says who? Are you a chef? A chef who owns or has owned his own restaurant? A sous chef? Ever been to culinary school? At least been a line cook at a high end…
" I'd probably bring the little dickens, but eat in shifts, and take turns minding him/her. I'm very self-conscious about bugging other people."
THAT would have been a fantastic idea.
It doesn't take an astrophysicist to know not to bring an infant into a Michelin rated restaurant. If a parent isnt sharp enough to know something as rudimentary as that I question if they are sharp enough to care for a child.
No, they are inconsiderate aholes and there is no two ways around that. Call them what they are, and that IS what they are.
Yes, they are hired at very low wages. If I had to live in a box in the alley behind THAT restaurant I would. Being able to put on my resume that I worked at the 6th rated restaurant in the world? Oh hell yes. That means from then on out every resto you apply at except for 5, wont be as good as this one. Working at…
So what? The ability to put that chef and his restaurant on your resume is more than worth it. Employed at the 6th rated restaurant in the world? Yeah, let me work two jobs and work at that one for free. Cause that one will get me a job basically anywhere in the world. Do you realize how many doors would open for you…
No, no, and no. If you bring an infant to a restaurant that costs this much you are a grade A low life A hole. Simple as that. typical case of parents thinking the world revolves around their little brat.
"Cancelled babysitter" is an "extraordinary circumstance"? So all someone has to do to get out of paying because something else came up is to say "Oh, my bad, my sitter cancelled."