serendouss
serendous s
serendouss

It’s all about the context for me. Nude or topless kid running around in the backyard, at the beach, at a park - fine. Topless or nude kid walking through Time Square with her topless, painted mother - not so much. It’s too sexualized. It’s like if a stripper took her toddler to work and let her walk around the stage

Probably not because ‘freedum!’. It would make sense, though, and cut down on one aspect of identity theft. But it could also be seen as legitimizing undocumented immigrants rather than encouraging them to move towards becoming documented. It’s a messed up system all the way around. If people come here to work and are

Right. I get that people are upset about what happened to this woman but you can’t totally ignore the fact that she presented with a fake ID that she likely bought off of someone who makes good money off of identity theft. They usually don’t make shit up wholesale, the identity likely belongs to someone who is going

So this woman gets to sit in lock up, no one is working, and the family is likely going to be separated. I guess that’s considered a win? This is a good example of why immigration reform needs to focus on streamlining the process of citizenship rather than booting people out. She had been here for years with no

Except that health care providers are required to report suspected fraud. She used a fake ID. Staff likely have been told to report that immediately especially since the provider could get in trouble for not doing so. In my clinic we get copies of IDs and insurance cards and we have been instructed to report to our

You suggested it. Seems more like people who don’t understand how laws work are the problem. Right up there with people who don’t understand that not everything requires a def-con 4 response.

And no race, ethnic, or religious-based groups either.

Some people like to complain. Seriously, though, it is illegal to deny her service. I know it seems like a piddling thing but the law has to be applied equally. That’s the kicker. In terms of legality, he’s no different than a white store owner that refuses to serve a black customer or a pharmacist that won’t fill a

Any place that requires an application and payment to join isn’t open to the public. A rec center with a pick up basketball game and a weight room is open to the public, Curves isn’t. Same way the local BDSM playhouse isn’t open to the public but the local sex toy emporium is. Different rules apply. But any man that

Then he has to do what he needs to do to legally to keep his estrogen free zone. It’s not hypocritical or moving the goal posts to point out just why some discrimination law suits have been beneficial and can be considered necessary even if I don’t always agree with them. The point about minorities missing

It’s not about feeling better. The law says a business that’s open to the public cannot discriminate based on sex, race, or religion. They cannot refuse to cut a woman’s hair because she is a woman. That’s it, that’s all. Don’t like it, take it up with the courts. Luckily we’ll all free to discriminate against dense,

You first. If they want to be dude-only they need to do the work to establish that legally. You know, like a responsible adult business owner. Or, better yet, act like adults, cut her hair, and then do the leg work to make sure no other women invade their sanctum.

The lawsuits aren’t frivolous necessarily because I think that in the case of exclusive golf clubs, professional organizations, etc...you can make the case that closing the ranks to minorities effectively cuts them out of opportunities. It’s about breaking down the racist, sexist old boys club. It’s less of a big deal

If it’s a private club they can exclude who they want to. If I want to start a private social club for fat girls into Hello Kitty, I can do so and I can choose to not offer membership to skinny dudes that like Star Wars. If I open a store that sells Hello Kitty stuff, I can’t refuse to sell a plushie to a black male

The difference is that ladies-only gyms are like private clubs - members pay for access to the equipment and environment. It’s not a business that’s open to the general public. If you have a business like a barbershop, bakery, etc...you are subject to anti-discrimination laws. You can’t refuse to provide a service to

I really really want to know why you were reading a French police report. Is it for a project? I’m on a true crime binge right now and I’m mostly sticking to early 19th century and earlier stuff and this seems right up there.

When I had my head shaved I went to a barbershop. I loved it. Quick service, a great cut, and way cheaper than going to a salon. Plus I didn’t have to deal with the smell of perm and acrylic.

It’s a general business and isn’t allowed to discriminate by sex, race, etc. Private clubs, like gyms, can be male or female only because they’re not open to the public. If the barber shop wants to be men only as a rule, they need to reclassify themselves as a private club and have people become members.

It’s likely that a coworker complained that she wasn’t pulling her weight during drinks service. If the other tasks were necessary and she was essentially doing things that helped it’s one thing. It’s a whole other thing if she was just sitting by while her coworkers picked up the slack. I’d be a little miffed too.

It’s all part of the same nativist mindset and is still a double standard and a more subtle way of being bigoted.