If you loved America you'd totally let everyone duplicate your shit.

Fish lodged in boy’s throat for 14 hours

What does "accidental release" mean? It was announced, so I'm not sure what wasn't on purpose (I mean, other than the sheer conversation slaughter it's proven to be)

I'm trying to work out if this is how you'd feel if you wanted an open relationship or not. It doesn't seem to be rooted in reality, so maybe it's rooted in something more personal? Or, flip side, you dated an asshole who tried to pull this on you?

I doubt that many cheaters are using that as an outlet if open relationships were viable. Not that many people can handle that, and I figure they already know who they are. Cheaters are cheating primarily because a) this is the only way they can get the extra sex and b) the illicit thrill, in my experience.

Usually I'm good at the creep. The creep is my friend. But in this, I can find no creep. Perhaps if I stare harder and take another pill...

Hey, is Noah Wyle bowlegged? He's tripping my Ackles-sensor in more ways than one up there.

::considers making her mucous membranes impregnable::

Evil? Sea kitties? Oh, never. They're cuddly wuddly tasty schmasty.

Normally vore doesn't involve impregnation, but it's a wide world out there.

Dang, yo momma freaky...can I call her?

There is no best calamari. Consider this public service.

The candiru? Is that worse than the ones that can live and die in your throat?

So if they'd implemented the interface they have without the burner functionality, you'd be good with it? Or would you need enough for people to be bannable or at least movable again?

This caused me to look up the definition of "inseminate" because I am nothing if not a pedant. Whoa, nellie! Firstly, there are definitions that align with my understanding of the word—you can't inseminate a mouth unless that's where your reproductive organs are too. Otherwise people giving BJs would be inseminated…

Eating calamari is almost always voluntary. Don't give up control!

What is the indication that they don't care about GoT? Why are they mutually exclusive? If the franchise was harmed, it was more by the people that gave unwise comments and then drew everyone's attention to it. They're not PR rookies, right? Some shit you just don't say. Being the truth is not a good enough reason.

Nothing is ever unanimous, really. (You hear that? NOTHING EVER)

The first few times I tried to make a top level, parent comment, it ended up as a child to an effectively random one.

A very kind person at IO9 wrote a script that works in Firefox and Opera that sets your default to blog view: [userscripts.org]