But why hold them responsible for an all caps mega-blast of publicity, when so far *they* are not the ones bringing it up? I mean, if news of the century is only revealed through interviews, why blame the source, not the interviewers pressing the issue?

I keep thinking I'll get over it, but every time I'm put to the test...

Did they retract Constantine's bisexuality?

But this wasn't revealed as part of a press release. It was first brought up as an answer to a reporter.

*Had* to do this? You're not implying that DC's homosexual quotient has been filled, so they don't need any more gay characters?

The text needs to come out and say that there's something about superheroes that makes them uber-straight, don't you think? It's really hard to tell the difference between "oh, that doesn't happen in this reality" and "I didn't want to bother with this issue in my writing" or "Isn't it lovely I can create a world…

I was gonna say toxoplasmosis, but that's pretty much covered by any random zombie flick.

Whut?

I did not know you could spell homage with two ems. You live and you learn.

If he can act, he should choose to do it more often. Or at least twice where i can see. I've been told Bill & Ted was more reciting lines than acting, because that's just who he was back then, and I'm willing to give him most of The Matrix. The problem? All his other performances.

Oh, okay. I've been using the monthly calendar as my movie planning tool for the upcoming few weeks. It's been handy for me.

Of all the things that are different in the New 52, someone revealing their homosexuality is the straw that breaks the suspension of disbelief? Not the de-aging, the healing of some, the discarding of others, the world-hostile-to-superheroes, superheroes being a recent phenomenon, Frankenstein killing Hitler?

Since at least one in ten superheroes should be gay, and are clearly not, why is it confusing when it's more like one in a hundred?

What is the evidence that the short straw was at work here, and not that the writer thought "Hmm. This is an good way to take this character..."?

And she should be sweeping because she's what?

Ah, thank you! Sometimes I feel like I'm running up and down the corridor yelling at people who look at me funny, but I'm glad it's not *always* something like that.

Which "others" are apparently gay? Is there more than one?

>, who cares about the sexuality of anyone these days

You did read this article where it says he's been de-aged and has no kids, right?

You're not bashing, just calling it crap?