Look, I’m just saying, and it’s not bigoted, but, there are dangerous people out there, and if we had some sort of system to identify and monitor particular minority groups, it would do a lot for our country. You know, like a monitoring group or a sentinel program.

Wait I was told that a third party vote is a vote for Hillary, and that to keep her out I had to vote for Trump? So which is it? Is a third party vote a vote for Hillary or Trump? It’s almost like people use that argument to get you to vote for whoever THEY want you to vote for... If I knew better I would almost…

I just personally wonder if it’s io9's editorial policy, or if it’s Katharine’s opinion, that

Look, I’m never gonna vote Trump. Ever. But, being rather conservatively minded, you’re not gonna catch me voting for Hillary either. NEITHER of them represent me. At all. So them telling me that Clinton is the better choice between them and trying to guilt me into voting for her is not effective.

“...while the other has devoted her life to public service, and has deep and valuable experience with the proven ability to work with Congress to pass desperately needed legislation.”

Really, it comes down to are there more people who hate in this country as opposed to those who do not hate. Also add in those that won’t put a woman in that position.

Yeah, well, actors told me about how great Obama was going to be too, so I don’t think that they’re running with that solid a track record here.

If, as some say, the government is broken, a protest vote will not fix it.

The Electoral College makes these kinds of statements/movements really stupid.

Stewart was right to stay out of it. And Simon Pegg should have as well.

A little gem of a comment on the Trek Against Trump page:
“Star trek promotes globalism and one world government. The creator of star trek was a 33rd degree free mason and was aware of the elites plans for the future and used it in his work while the sheep sit there and think its fiction. On the surface the idea sounds…