seehag
See Hag
seehag

Agreed about the addictiveness component...look at William Burroughs, etc. who were “Junkys” for years and years. I was commenting more on the OP’s great sense of despair...near-suicide by lack of risk aversion – going to a strangers’ house for an ostensible threesome (normally actually the disgusting dude forcing the

Wow, that’s a really eloquent and beautiful of describing such a despairing situation. Substance addiction is our modern vampirism.

It’s...not a thing. The subculture of people who are “poly” and “chill” doing heroin casually with people they meet online is exceedingly small. Please don’t do this again. I don’t even know you and I care about you more than a bored poly housewife who’d give an inexperienced stranger heroin.

I don’t have much for this, sorry. I’m not clear on the part about not getting up and walking out after the part about the live-in baby/baby-mama came up. Oh, and spelling the word “jipped” doesn’t make it any less offensive. Sorry.

I think if they really didn’t want topless young (but legal 18 year old) girls submitting nudity, they would have banned it. They’re pornhub and they specifically said nudity wouldn’t disqualify you? It would absolutely disqualify you in every other scholarship fund (obviously) so it seems to me to be a sneaky way to

Maybe I’m a prude, but I think rather than have a pornhub scholarship (which is striking me as creepy) they could get the same good if not better PR by just commiting to donate 25,000 every year to a reputable scholarship fund of their choosing.

But are we okay with the fact that nudity is allowed? And that 18 year olds may feel pressure to submit a topless video to go to college (with the assumption that being naked will only HELP with a pornhub scholarship)?

What charities or scholarships has Jezebel set up and funded?

Is calling him, “him” hate speech? I mean technically his genes are still coded as male. So it’s not inaccurate. Where as he has changed his name to Catelyn, so calling him Bruce is in fact inaccurate.

Well she was still Bruce at the time of the accident right? (Don’t feel like reading grey comments /lazy) I know some were contemplating a possible defense she may use is that “Bruce is at fault and not Caitlan”. I’m sure that wouldn’t fly in court though.

Seems a bit odd though I suppose you are suppose to have control of your vehicle at all times. Still Jenner seems ultimately responsible to me. Still kind of annoyed that she won’t serve time for manslaughter. Just continues the story of famous people usually getting away with a slap on the wrist if that.

OK, thanks for helping me out with the pedantics, it reminds me of my days at the institution in question. By “it,” I mean you. It would be exceedingly like a member of the full faculty to not be able to make the leap of simple logic that in a post about Chicago, the institution in question was in that city.

I hear people in Chicago refer to it as UC quite often. I am native Californian so it used to confuse the living daylights out of me.

University of chicago. UC

Well, maybe the recent jubilation on Jezebel about the Ashley Madison situation has skewed our memory (and let’s not forget that both Sam Biddle and Isha Aran posted the link to the Fappening photos in their initial posts), but I think by and large people felt sad for Lawrence about the hack and about the crowing of

Um, the University of Chicago...is a rather large academic institution...in Chicago? The various University of California entities, since there are so many of them, are usually referred to by their locations, i.e. UC Davis, UC Chico, UC Berkeley, UCLA etc.

In this case UC is University of Chicago, where fun goes to die.

Actually the academics at UC are widely regarded as the nastiest, cheatiest, pettiest and most vindictive in the world. In academia. That’s really saying something.

I’m sure it’ll be just as boring and derivative as all other Hollywhite vehicles. How fun.

This is a perfect idea because they look alike and I generally avoid things they are in and/or write. Avoiding two birds with one stone, if you will.