Fair enough. I just think that the headline is especially sensationalist & misleading due to the fact that it is not him.

Dude, don't fucking jump down my throat, I was trying to agree with you. I didn't say you attacked him for being gay - but PEOPLE WHO DON'T LIKE GAYS MIGHT.

You not editing the headline to include the fact that this was not Paul Rudd is a fine example of why Jezebel is terrible now.

NPH is horrible, but in no way because of gay. It's for all the other stuff, and HIMYM. Why can't America obsess like this about a more deserving gay actor? Or actress.

Hmm. Californication, excellent? Try absolutely cringeworthy and terrible from start to finish.

This person is clearly trolling.

As far as they're concerned, it is for men. Specifically that sexy 18-45 demographic that runs the entire world.

Yuuuup. This, exactly, is what I keep trying to explain to people. It's also why I red flag any people I know who refer to women as "females"

That's just, like, your opinion, man. And you're WRONGGGGGGG.

Now that I would love to see.

Yay. But...GOD DAMN IT I resent everything being empire waisted.

At Alabama, there ARE integrated organizations tantamount to what you suggest. They just aren't the GOOD, Old Row, Machine sororities that give you access to all the influence and cache and bullshit. Google Mallet Assembly if you care.

You were told wrong.

I LOVED the Dear White People trailer. I would have watched that movie.

Aughhh it's like a shrimp and a mole had a babby!

But she misspelled Lorelai's name, so points lost there.

Psh. The CGI on Game of Thrones is SO MUCH BETTER than it was on, like, The Tudors.

I find these ads unnerving down to the weird photo quality.

Wait, why would they need her? I'm not even kidding. Marissa is *dead*. Wut?

Idk, Ainsley's objection to the ERA was pretty weak.