We would be less likely to formulate it like that if he hadn't implied that control of F1 will have to be pried form his cold, dead hands.
SeaOfAshes
seaofashes
Oh I don't give a shit about somebody who parks illegally and gets their car crushed as a result. In fact, I would personally love it if that just happened automatically. The case of the people still in the car was referring more to people trapped in a tunnel and afraid to leave their car because of smoke.
What about an Escalade or a semi?
And if there are people, alive, in those parked cars?
Except your wages don't include the cost of keeping up on the pensions of the people you replaced.
Thanks.
So, I replied to someone about 5 minutes after my first comment, saying I hadn't seen the damn light showing green for the cars, but it's currently in he 7th circle of Kinja. I get it, the hordes of people pointing that out. Unfortunately, this insanely stupid misunderstood commenting system does not want that to come…
Did not notice that light, and couldn't tell the color on the light on the right.
Definitely did not see that at first. I was trying to see a color on the light on the right side and couldn't, so just assumed the stopped traffic meant she had right of way.
Nevermind. Did not see that the light going straight was green. With the cars stopped, I thought the main street had a red. Yeah, she's an idiot. Kind of weird how she just left, then. I would have tried to stop her as the driver of the Corolla.
She didn't have time to deal with the idiot driver, and that bike probably (hopefully) cost less than her time as well.
No, actually, there isn't more to the story. That's why Holder just announced that the Justice Department will not condone using Federal civil forfeiture law in these cases, but many states still have them.
The irony is that if you do purchase any one of many materials that could be used in bomb-making, or if they do spot you at a known drug den under surveillance, then they can LEGALLY obtain warrants to spy on you. The difference then is they have legitimate reasons and are subject to judicial oversight.
Actually, agents given access to data that is illegally recorded DO ABUSE THE PRIVILEGE. Paranoid? We were called paranoid for thinking the government was spying on everyone before Snowden proved the government was spying on everyone. Paranoid is someone who is so afraid of a "terrorist" attack to be okay with the…
The difference is security cameras don't stockpile data on every single person/car that passes in front of them and keep it for an unknown period of time to be used in secret court hearings or not-so-secret "civil forfeiture" situations without ever proving a crime.
Except they also have no reason to read my emails and texts, snoop on my Skype calls, nor follow my travels through my phone GPS or license plate, yet they do ALL of that without any judicial oversight or notification (to me). Thanks for making my point.
Would you say the same thing if they broke down your door and searched your house? "I don't care if I have nothing to hide and they leave the place the way they found it!"
The biggest neighborly invasion of the last half-century in the Mid East was enabled and partially sponsored by the US. And realistically, no one is trying to nuke Israel. Ignoring how stupid of an idea that is from a tactical standpoint, it wouldn't really serve anyone any good.