Dismissed.

Llllaaaaaaaaaaasssssssttttttt wooooord

You... have some sense how unconvincing you are, right? Like, you have literally been begging for attention from me for days. I am the only person reading any of these comments. I am mortified for you. I really seemed to have broken some little part of you. Anyway, continue to yell at me in a closet, by yourself. I…

Snookums, are you going to brag to women at the bar today about how you are stalking someone who made fun of you on the internet and how you TOTALLY WON!

Oh snookums, I did.

Llllaaaaaaaaaaasssssssttttttt wooooord

Huh, it must be one of those weird bans were I am still able to post and my posts remain visible, which I was able to do moments ago.

Checking something...

Llllaaaaaaaaaaasssssssttttttt wooooord

Oh, what a general you are in the culture war campaign against adjectives that make you feel small.

You sad, sad fuck. Hey, here is something cool: the word “unctuous” pulls up literally dozens of Google News stories from the past week alone!

“that is a word that is rarely seem or heard outside of pre-20th century literature.” What word, you absolute fucking moron? Learn how to write a goddamned sentence that defines your terms.

You are wrong. Anyone who told you this is wrong and you need to tell them so.

What SPECIFIC terms are so unctuous to you, dolt? You are straight up as vague and unwilling to put in the tiniest amount of effort in backing up their points with anything other than smugness as a first year college kid writing their first paper.

I’m sorry that you hang around morons. It has ruined you.

That you think any of the words I used were obscure is a much harsher slam on you than I could ever hope to deliver.

Commentary sections in most serious journals are peer-reviewed. All researchers have biases towards being interested in the problems they are examining. Dismissing their work because of their relation to a suicide victim is pretty disgusting. You have also claimed so many times that you have studies and haven’t…

So basically you are unwilling to deal with cognitive dissonance so you retreat to ignorance, self-congratulating yourself all the while. Again, make a methodical critique of the underlying data they present or go fuck yourself.

Damn those anti-suicide special interests (seriously, they are biased against suicide? Academics affected by social phenomena can’t produce work on these phenomena?) , writing a peer reviewed commentary article in a reasonably high profile journal summarising the state of the field!

Trace was used purely as a listing of a variety of options. I welcome countervailing studies. That does not render them immune to criticism and if the research is funded by pro-gun interests, it would be hypocritical of you to complain about one source I provided among several so.