You are making a normative argument and confusing it for a legal one. You have also not actually made a counter-argument about the relationship between gun control measures and suicides. “[M]ore causal instead of a direct correlation” is gibberish.

Your inane sociopathy is not really a meaningful perspective on this policy issue. I have no interest in your mediocre newsletter.

And providing no limitations to folks with mental illness to purchase guns is not a slippery slope? You seem to be presuming that there has literally been no policy efforts in this regard, which demonstrates a bit of ignorance about this issue. There are already a number of state and federal laws with regards to…

This is incorrect. Read the NIH study I have posted several times. Since most suicide attempts happen in very close temporal distance from ideation, gun control measure do lower suicide rates.

You have very little idea about what you are talking about:

An econometric explanation:

There is a tonne of research that demonstrates that suicide is most often without much planning and is affected significantly by impediments on means:

There are a lot of confounding variables there, which make that type of direct comparison between international rates, from geographical features to poverty to cultural factors.

So you are seriously stalking me now? I am dismissing your comments, but really: you have decided that chasing around a stranger to call them crazy across a bunch of pages is the way you want to live your life.

Oh snookums, truly life has become a tragedy victimising you.

Even among the depressed, suicide is much more common among people who own guns. The suicide rate among gun owners declines with reduced gun access, so things like longer waiting periods, mental health screening, and safety requirements like trigger locks/gun safes (which can significantly disrupt the connection…

The AEI is a terrible source and you should feel bad for using it,

This is ahistorical nonsense and you should feel ashamed to drag it out.

Call me a Nutt, but is the best part of docking when you jizz all over each other’s cocks, issuing a Rebel yell in unison as time seems to Freeze as cords of hot cum don’t Ole Miss landing all over your fuck buddy’s balls, or what?

Couple of quick questions: 1) are you aware that removal from office after an impeachment requires a two-thirds vote of the Senate and 2) Republicans do not have anything close to a two-thirds majority in the Senate?

So basically you want to condescendingly dismiss the violation of some portion of victims of revenge porn because you feel super fucking proud of yourself for no one on earth ever wanting to see you naked?

You are literally insane if you think I am going to read that insanely pompous failed NY Times oped. Further replies will be dismissed simply because I think that it will annoy you that I am not treating you with the batshit seriousness that you bestow yourself. FOAD.

What does your boss think about the term “SJWs”? Because you are super willing to buddy up with folks who think it is not at all an embarrassing thing to say so long as you think they will fight your battles for you.

Snowflake, you have to accept that when you communicate your (idiotic) thoughts in a public place, people may say that they disagree with you and that you can’t just respond with combo “SHUT UP SHUT UP LEAVE ME ALONE/I KNOW YOU ARE BUT WHAT AM I?”.

So you do understand yourself to be whiny, but lack the strength of character to stop your mewling about the mean ol SJWs?