In the 70s, K.Kardashian would have been considered too “ethnic” and not skinny enough to be a Charlie’s Angel. Source: was around then, and well recall the prevailing esthetic of the day.

I remain highly skeptical yet open-minded regarding this case, because if the kid pulled a gun on the officer that thing looks real and dangerous.

And that means what exactly? A. He was 13 and thus not legally allowed to carry a gun. B. He pulled it on the fucking cops. But please act like your comment is some kind of smug, know it all retort to reality and facts.

Which matters how? Pointing a gun at an officer is still grounds for that officer to use self-defense. There are lots of videos on this on Youtube: Open Carry doesn’t grant any special legal protections at all to the person with the gun, just that they can’t be arrested for just having the gun. IF they pull it out or…

You pushed a hot button, and that’s going to obscure your point forevermore. But I actually see what you mean: 70s magazine covers were a bland array of snub-nosed blondes with blue eyes and fair complexions. Things may not be radically better, but at least they’ve somewhat improved from that homogeneous beauty…

Totally agree.

Kim Kardashian is (or was, at least) very very attractive. She does not have the standard white girl look that, admittedly, I fall for too.

Again, why are they told to address campus police and not the regular police department?

I think people treat each other well irl because people hit back there. It’s like the Trump supporter who punched the black guy in the face while he was being held by police. As brave as he wants to make himself be, the fact is he punched a guy who was being held back in a room full of people like him who would…

The child was in no immediate danger and crime scene photos are SOP.

The fact that there’s a substantial amount of the population that this is a good way to carry yourself is the real problem here. When he talks about someone and there’s outrage because he insulted a person or a group of people they just devalue it and treat it as being overly PC but when people hit back it’s all about…

Comfort: humans stop having a lot of babies when they reach a certain level of living, in a really wide spectrum of cultures. Italy is full of Catholic grandmothers and has still reached that plateau—advertising campaigns aren’t going to change that.

Never underestimate the selfish motivation of those interested in procreation. Adopt, maybe? Nope, it absolutely HAS to be their genes because fuck everyone else.

Funny. I saw a bunch of people commenting on this on another article. But I think it is a really good point that it is disturbing we keep pumping out more humans knowing about overpopulation. Our whole economic system is built on buying useless crap, and we need young people to buy and make it. So in the end keeping a…

We don’t need maternity leave. The science is still out on whether replenishing the human race is a good idea. Why commit ourselves to new laws before all the facts are in?

Facts are un-American. Why do you hate the troops?

What part of “they were initially charged with murder, and had hate crime provisions tacked on after” did you miss in the article? Clearly, their “privilege” (and I’d hesitate to say these trashy fools had any) doesn’t allow what you think it does.

No, he’s going to veto a bill that would open up the US to all kinds of foreign lawsuits.

Whose hailing this as a triumph? By Colorado law Cinemark had the right to recoup costs in a litigation case that the plantiffs lost. They didn’t want to keep having to pay for appeals and agreed to not pursue the claim if the plaintiffs agreed to no further appeals. Oh as for ‘next time we might not be so generous so…

Undecided swing voters have no reason to take offense? No offense to you, but Hillary doesn’t need to rally women and minorities. Trump is the rallying point. It’s funny to me, amongst liberals, how often people read playing to the base as useful in a presidential election. It’s not. She won the primary. She’s got to…