It’s not a typo if the author doesn’t know the difference.

i mean, it’s not like iCloud Photos didn’t have a very serious and very public security problem.

While I thought I knew pretty much everything about football (except what a catch in the NFL is) can someone explain how this is legal?

The insurance fraud one is the only really bad one, and even that is not heinous. I was expecting greaseball stuff. Instead, it’s several variations on “These ladies are pretty!” Presumably on pictures of ladies who want to be told they are pretty.

Getting tackled by a girl is nothing to be ashamed of. Now getting tackled by a kicker...

Say what you want about homeboy’s complete lack of basic self-preservation instincts, but he fucking stuck that landing.

But it literally happened. She could have shaken his hand, she could have just touched a shoulder, but she embraced him. Trying to read into the quality of the embrace or what expressions on her face indicate whatever feelings she had is, to me, pointless.

What a non-story. GWB is a fucking dolt, but it’s been clear for some time that the Bushes and Obamas have genuine respect and affection for each other. Personally I find it encouraging that powerful people on clearly opposite sides of the aisle can still have this sort of relationship. Maybe someday we’ll actually be…

Its really hard for people with mental imbalances and below-average emotional intelligence to understand that people are not all evil and not all good. Jordan Sargent, we are all rooting for you in your continued fight against your obviously severe mental handicap.

I’m not sure if this is earnest or not, but I feel like this is pretty dumb. Who knows what was possibly going through her mind? Who knows how she feels about Bush? Basing conjecture on a two second snippet from a public event just seems unnecessary to me. What is even the point of this post?

I seriously can’t tell if this article is satire. The woman “Danielle” sounds like a complete narcissist who absolutely refuses to accept a sincere apology multiple times, climbs leaps and bounds above the chain of command to the CEO of the company, gets a month paid leave, and comes back expecting what exactly? Did…

I feel no pity for this woman. Not once in the chat log was there anything alluding to rape, just the song. The rape portion of the song wasn’t even what they were joking about. The guy apologized MULTIPLE times, and yet she still felt the need to email Tim Cook (who by the way won’t read this petty crap anyways…

You’re a lone voice of logic and reason.

This. All day long this.

Yes, they are trying to keep you in business. That last “frivolous” lawsuit bankrupted Gawker and will do the same to the other sites if you aren’t careful!

I am not defending Univision’s actions because we will NEVER have the whole truth about the subject but these “Gawker is innocent guys! Come on! Stop picking on me!!!” posts have to stop. It’s embarrassing. You deal in smut, you eventually get repercussions. Let Gawker die please. Find a way to channel all this crap…

Maybe if you made better journalistic decisions you wouldn’t have pissed off people that can force you into bankruptcy.

Maybe Gawker’s editorial union will like to defend against Peter Thiel funded lawsuits. No? Then STFU and let your member’s bosses do their jobs.

Temper tantrum post?

That's exactly the WRONG way to think about this. You can't measure this in a relative way to other locker rooms. This is awful behavior. No one, in any capacity, should ever have to put up with this shit.