Whose the villain there on the real-life cover? The Shadow King? Man, they should have used him in one of these prequel movies.

I agree that it's a far more plausible ending given the world building, as well as tying into the theme of the story (In that we are doomed to repeat our bad habits if we merely try to avoid or just not reflect on them).
Then again, maybe it's because I'm just a total pussy or something, but ultimately I prefer the…

https://www.youtube.com/wat…

Oh, why thank you for sourcing me. I think that's the first time that's ever happened.

Thanks for all the insight over these past few years, Mike.

Still, I highly encourage D'Onofrio's enthusiasm. This version of Kingpin, going off of his portrayals in Daredevil so far, might create some genuine stakes when plucky Peter Parker stumbles into his plans. Plus, if Marvel is indeed planning go get as much mileage out of Spidey as they conceivably can, I'm all for…

Oh, okay. Well, now I'm even more confused then as to why he's surprised there is consistent pejorative coverage over Trump on this website.

I would warrant to guess you haven't been to this site for quite a few months now…

I would warrant to guess you haven't been to this site for quite a few months now…

"President Blackenstein"…

It's only been a month and a half. Crazy, huh?

When you say "creators of X-23," are you referring to her original appearance in X-Men: Evolution?

I was just about to correct you, saying "Avengers 5" might be over-shooting it, but then I remembered the Russo brothers clarified that their second Avengers movie technically won't be a part 2, so Avengers 5 might actually be plausible.

I can understand Marvel's hesitance with keeping their shows and movies separate, and the fact that the MCU doesn't take place 90% within the confines of Manhattan, unlike 616, certainly helps with that. The Defenders might change that, but that won't be for a little while longer.

I like to think Ben Shapiro is the adult version of Mandark from Dexter's Laboratory who gave up on mad science.

I honestly had high hopes when Yiannopoulos was set to be on Real Time, even though I don't like him in the slightest. Then I just watched Mahar and the other commentators just shit on him for the whole panel. The whole thing was just to reaffirm both their own bias and the persecution complex possibly held by…

Exactly. I can actually agree with him on a lot of topics, and I can respect it when he says something I vehemently disagree with. But if only he weren't so fucking smug all of the time.

Larry Wilmore held the whole "round-table" thing phenomenally better, mostly because he respected his guests and all let them have a chance to speak, even if he didn't agree.

No worries. In retrospect, I didn't quite make that explicit at first.

Yeah, but I wasn't making any preferences. I'm frustrated with the whole thing, but I'm especially frustrated when one given ideology claims to have the high ground.