I’d pay cold hard cash to bring back outward visibility. A 1991 Honda Civic Si would be a great benchmark.

Wonder what the next-gen PHEV version will be like?

Also, it’s not as horrific as the cave-like atmosphere in the Tahoe/Suburban, but why such thick C and D pillars? It can’t all be for roof crash testing, right? Why do so few OEMs prioritize outward visibility for passengers and rearwards visibility for the driver?

Aside/fun fact: that was the last vehicle in the U.S. to come with a factory cassette deck.

Proof that science and comedy go hand-in-hand. 

They think our insistence to dilute soda with ice cubes detracts from both taste and your wallet. “I ordered and paid for a 0.2L cola.”

This. 

Well-stated. Thank you. 

This.

Came here for this. Thank you. 

Yes, you’re right.

Yes, the utilities and car companies have been working with the national fire folks on this since the 1990s. The bright orange wires are one output of that in today’s EVs.

COTD (if we still did that).

Which will have higher production - Lordstown or Vector?

Why does the green one in the article look slammed? Don’t they know we drink Energy drinks, bro? Yo?

So much this. Prime it, Toyota.

So much this. Who would have ever thought, “yeah, the current Silverado looks better than this.”

1. Why no PHEV version?

1st. Aston Martin - I’m not good at math or financial planning, but spending a lot of quid on overhead when one doesn’t have much in the bank doesn’t seem like a good plan.

We don’t like rear visibility anymore, because cameras and screens. The Chevy Camaro may die off, but it’s coffin-like visibility will live on in other rigs.

I see. This will look more like an AMC Eagle/Acura MDZ/BMW X6 than an XJ or Honda Pilot. Who needs cargo space and great rear visibility anyway? I definitely want a claustrophobia-inducing car with no room to haul anything.