But where do you draw the line? If ESPN or formerly Gawker came in contact with a celebrity who is using committing SS fraud and posted their SSN would that be an invasion of the person’s privacy? Having their SSN posted on a legitmate story? I would argue yes, but from many people (not just you) posting that SSN…

He just needs to show up occaisionally, play LF and strike out. After the game hold a bible study at Home. The fans in TN will be most gracious and giving of their money.

With so many minor league teams in smaller towns and some of them even being in towns that are more religious than others, teams would be foolish not to sign this cash cow.

I have no issues with someone choosing to stand for the National Anthem or not. What I have a problem is that Kap is a massive coward. He is taking the easy way out and has a look of not truly caring about the issue he is protesting for. I hope in the next few days he begins to actually work to getting all people…

The Chargers realized without his family’s mafia connections they would never find a construction company to build a stadium.

Finally an intellectually honest assessment of the Foundation. Just because a person can do something, does not mean they should. However yes, they need to close it down.

Really? You honestly think that someone taking a year off is still going to be in the first round? You clearly do not understand the business side of sports and only look at things through fandom. Yes he was the best player, but he is a year older and hasn’t played. Any business will look at the risk of rust and…

To each their own. Id rather take the $16 or so guaranteed money as opposed to waiting to be re-drefted having sat out for one year and taking my chances I will get drafted in the 1st round again. I realize his family is not in dire straights, but lets face it, he is going to lose far more than his guaranteed bonus.

I always liked giving people “temporary immunity” on my properties and then usury them into oblivion with sky high interrests rates when i call that immunity in.

A stadium deal is not just the extent of their corporate welfare. Plus governments can start looking deeper into the owners if necessary.Also if the owner lives in said state.

It hasn’t been that negative for Josh being out either. Looking at it for a one player does skew results. However having the testing policy, they probably have gotten out of many work comp provisions when people fail. While their contracts are not guaranteed you still see injured players using the facilities of their…

As an employer you and your employees are NOT in the public eye. Also, I am guessing you do not take up millions of state and local welfare. Politics plays a huge role

No they probably could not...or would not. That would be ceding to the union in the contract. So what would you have the players give up?

I do not disagree. But there are states where the NFL plays would probably would. Therein lies the fault with what he is advocating. He is advocating for putting cart in front of the horse. Work on government first then the league would have carte blanche for this matter.

If they never tested, then yes. The problem is with such a high profile corporation and issue, you cant just stop testing. There would be governmental backlash by some state like Indiana or Louisiana that would make it impossible.

Horrible interview.

Repealing that ammdenment sounds great to some. However it will never get repealed in the foreseeable future. Not going to happen and wont even get debated on.

Thank you for this. I am either voting for her or Gary Johnson, so this helps make up my decision

Oval diamonds with high clarity will make up for a smaller size, if in the right setting.

I know. It is the pronunciation that is the problem.