Everyone knows you soak your tampons in vodka, not beer.

The parent should have looked on the bright side. If you needed tampons you clearly weren’t a hussy who found herself in the family way.

WTF? So I assume that you were over the legal age in your area, being a teacher and all. Why did the admin feel the need to bring you in to the office? THIS is what kills me, admin who can’t just say to the busy body parents, “That is really non of your concern, or mine.” And Tampons and beer? So? I am so grumpy at…

I'm surprised that song from the new Hunger Games movie that Jennifer Lawrence sang isn't up there—Academy voters love shit like that.

This is great, but my personal favorite is Dr. Atkins. The man slipped and hit his head on the icy pavement, which sent him in a coma, from which he never recovered.

I don't think he was trying to slut shame her. I think he was asking why she would do that, knowing how he felt about her, because it would give him hope, or he felt lead on by that. He was clearly vulnerable to her and cared about her a lot. If the roles were reversed I know I wouldn't want to feel like a notch on…

these guys are upset:

I don't need feminism because I'd prefer my doctors to discuss my health issues with my husband rather than me. Those big words just confuse me.

I'm the same. I would love to believe in a creator but I think that if there IS a God then it won't be like we think, it will more than likely be the creator of a simulation which we live in and will have no more awareness or control (or interest) in our lives than I do over the lives of the individual people in Sim…

You're hiding behind semantics. Of COURSE not having enough information changes the question. "Do you like Chicago?" I can't answer. I've never been there. If I answered yes or no I'd be lying! "Do you think the Spurs will bea the Thunder?" I haven't seen any of the games. "Do you think Modi will be a good prime…

I think these discussions rest on poorly defined concepts. How can we discuss this w/o having a working definition of what "God" or "god" means?

Actually, you're wrong. I believe that it's possible that a god or gods exist... BUT that the human religions are wrong about what those gods are. After all, we do have a tendecy to humanize or anthropomorphize everything in sight.
So basically I believe that the creator of the universe could exist... BUT that…

Sorry, no. Saying that anything is "either this OR that and nothing else" is just ignoring, well, practically everything.

"Do gods exist?" is a yes or no question that we can't know the answer to at this time.

Oh that's ridiculous. It is not a yes or no question. I could care less if anyone thinks I'm an atheist, it's just a meaningless label, yet I still go with an answer of "I don't see why gods can't exist but my open mindedness to an idea doesn't make it true"

The difference is the examples you provided have a way to measure the state of each outcome. A oven can he proven to be heated or not heated with a thermometer, a female can be proven to be pregnant with medical knowledge and technology. The foundation of agnosticism is based off of the fact that we can not measure…

Right. They're two different questions.
I'm an agnostic theist. I was raised Catholic and abandoned that, discarded everything I knew from there to try to see what I really believe. I'm agnostic because I believe that existence of god(s) is inherently unknowable. But I'm still a theist because deep down inside, I do…

I'd argue that agnosticism is the rejection of the concept of belief entirely - it doesn't engage with the question in a binary fashion, because the question itself is irrelevant. In response to 'do you believe' I think the agnostic answer is: n/a.

I don't quite agree with this. For your question "Do you believe that god(s) exist?", you could answer "Yes", "No", or a variation of "Maybe". You could answer "maybe" to not be labeled an atheist, but you could also answer "maybe" because you might believe that if there is a god it is not like the one religions teach…