schrodingers
schrodingers
schrodingers

Jesus. You had nothing to add and just needed correct something with a sarcastic question with no benefit to the conversation. That’s rude. It would be rude in real life as well.

A one line comment that added nothing to the conversation other than your apparent need to correct someone is rude. And ends and beginnings tend to go together if you hadn’t noticed. The question was what car represents the end of an era, not which car typifies an era.

Do you know how not to be rude and condescending? The car doesn’t have to be part a era in order to mark the end. It signified the change over, hence end.

I was talking about aesthetic design. Obviously the II and the Fox body aren’t build on the same platform, but that doesn’t mean the design wasn’t continued from the Mustang II.

I just don’t see the Mustang II as continuation. If anything the Fox body was an evolution of the II and the ‘94 from the Fox body.

Consider how different the second, third and fourth generation Mustangs are to the 2005 in appearance. There’s almost a 30 year gap in design language.

The New Beetle marked the of 90s car design language and beginning of retro. Rightly or wrongly its financial success seems to have spawned this trend. After it was release you get BMW Mini’s, new Fiat 500, the 2005 Mustang, the 2008 Challenger, and the 2010 Camaro.

I’ve seen someone dailying a Lagonda in Chicago in January. Which amused me. They are even more ludicrous looking in person.

Ken Box approves:

The wheel kind of reminds me of the Renault Avantime for some reason. Maybe because of the sharp angles and the silver contrast.

I think the Ferrari carries the assumption (incorrect as it may be) that it’s owner bought it to be seen in rather than to enjoy driving. The reason you hear stories about Enzo hating his customers.

Weren’t they also available in Mexico? I’m thinking a “tourist” brought it on their vacation and it just so happened to get left behind.

That steering wheel looks horrible and unergonomic. I get that there’s only so many ways to do steering wheels (due to airbags), but that shouldn’t be one.

An eye moving independently like that freaks me out more than it probably should.

That second one, I can’t even process it. Why?

Tell me those monstrosities are spinners, because it looks like the might be.

I don’t think he actually knows what Social Security is or how it works.

The same in Louisville, direction gets reversed depending on if it’s morning or afternoon to get more traffic in or out of downtown. It still confuses inattentive people occasionally.

What’s a suspension?

“What? Civic is evolving!”