I thought it might be a relevant point. Guess not.
I thought it might be a relevant point. Guess not.
Yes. This isn’t a Camille Cosby situation. And even in that situation (where I do think Cosby is complicit), refusing to incriminate your husband in a deposition is not equal to rape.
I’m sure you have a point here, but damned if I know what it is.
Juanita’s description of Hillary’s behavior read to me like a wife talking to a mistress. I got an I-know-you’re-fucking-my-husband vibe, personally.
The accusation of rape and intimidation bu HRC is from *1978* Do you need help with the math?
One assumes when Hillary Clinton says that sexual assault victims have a right to be believed, she means by the authorities etc. when they report. Because a lot of women have a hellish time with the police and whatnot placing the burden of proof on sexual assault victims and re-victimizing them. And I also agree with…
It’s puzzling that so many people are angrier at Hillary than at the man actually accused of rape. And that includes the alleged victim.
Yup. And everyone seems to be angrier at Hillary for all of this than the man actually accused of rape. Until that stops being the case, I refuse to let the alleged actions of Hillary’s husband impact my opinion of her as a candidate. And she is still by far the best candidate in this election.
It’s puzzling to me how many people are acting like this is new information. Or like Hilary Clinton is somehow more responsible for Bill Clinton’s behavior than Bill Clinton is.
I’m skeptical because she seems angrier at Hillary than at the man who allegedly raped her and that shit doesn’t sit well with me. I’m skeptical because she has contradicted herself so many times, and seems to only come out of the woodwork when Hillary is running for something. I’m skeptical because she doesn’t seem…
How is the wife of someone who cheats supposed to act? Public figure or not, this is a unique space. The idea that Hillary would embrace women who fucked her husband — while knowing she was married to him — is inconceivable. Broaddrick is the only example of a woman who has claimed to be raped by Clinton. Affairs are…
If Ken Starr didn’t bite on it, it’s probably a nothingburger.
No, but she does have a lifelong history of public service. It’s interesting to me that the perception is that HRC took on Universal Healthcare because she wanted the power that came with it, and not because she was genuinely interested in using her abilities to actually help people. Personally, I believe she was…
You can’t know what’s going on with them, though. That’s the thing. HIS career suffered no serious setbacks because of the allegations, yet guilt by association is apparently enough to tank the career his wife (who has not, as far as I know, ever been accused of rape)?? They’re not actually the same person. Meanwhile,…
Well, even if a man rapes a woman, it's not his fault. Blame his wife!!
All I know is I will NOT be voting for Bill Clinton this November.
I have no idea if Broaddrick’s allegations are true or not, but her story is credible enough, and should be treated with sensitivity and seriousness.
I don’t know if Bill Clinton raped her or not, but I do find it odd that she seems to focus so much on ruining Hillary’s career over the issue. Her evidence that Hillary even would have known about the incident is shaky at best - Hillary shook her hand and said thank you, in what was perceived to be a menacing tone?…
“Ambition is to Hillary what silver was to Judas”