schmoker--disqus
Schmoker
schmoker--disqus

Into The Dalek doesn't lend a lot of credence to the show having a No One Is Expendable ethos. Ditto Orient Express

I try not to be too bothered by wonky continuity stuff, but …

Considering how many times Archer has radically overhauled its premise, you'd think people would get that doing so actually is what Archer is.

Well, you say that …

I'd take Bowie's place in death to have a threesome with the two of them. But only if she's made up as Bowie and Bowie is made up as Scully. I would be made up as a fat guy in his mom's basement. It's a stretch for me, but I'm willing.

I texted George Clooney, who then called back and did a spot on Brad Pitt impression.

Money can't but happiness, but it can rent it for the rest of your life.

Yes, that's a good way to put it. But what really shocked me when I watched them recently was the filmmaking. By that I mean that there is some. Quite a lot actually. Comparing those last two Pirates flicks direction to literally any comic book movie made the past decade is not even fair. It's like comparing a

How in the hell does Favreau's Happy rate a spot on the poster?

"I just got of the phone, with my lawyers, who assured me I better shut the fuck up before the Rich family owns Fox News."

John McCain was supposed to do another segment, but he had to leave early to go vote for Scott Pruitt and Jeff Sessions again, then kill and eat a small child to keep his youthful, maverick vigor.

The last two Pirates and most every big budget behemoth that comes out these days really point up just how underappreciated Verbinski's flicks were. The second and third were bloated as hell, but they both sure beat the shit out of your average Marvel movie or Jurassic Trek Into Darkness for cinematic skill and

Those are two I have yet to get to. I'm in the process of rereading The Dark Tower books, which are simultaneously my favorite fantasy novels and the only ones I've read since I was a kid. The first book is solid, if slight, but beginning with the second, it's some of the best world building sci-fantasy I've ever

No, I meant the literal physical destruction and rehabilitation. There is one very long passage in particular when a character must fight with his bum leg while trying to survive and get away. It felt very real. Those were the parts of the book that really sang. The rest was just ok compared to his best work.

The book is sort of like that. It's not among his best books, but it has some great stuff it in that sort of spews out much like the shit weasels. The parts I enjoyed the best were the ones that were obviously informed by King's recovery and physical rehabilitation after being struck by the van. Otherwise it's a

That's definitely works. That movie is shit, but it's batshit shit.

Campy gold is a great description. It is a fairly terrible movie, but it's fun watching all these great actors hack away at it. Hoffman is just a blast as he bickers and dithers.

I would read a book called Michael Crichton's Ape Farts

Sphere is one of my favorite terrible movies. Just listening to Dustin Hoffman ramble about a monster named Jerry never gets old. I also get a kick out of the scene where he admits he cribbed the Alien First Contact Plan he wrote for the government from old science fiction novels just to get a paycheck.

But he fought in the Bore Wars, I heard.