I’m hoping the USSF doesn’t settle because I’m really curious to see if the women would actually boycott the Olympics. I can’t ever seeing that they would but then again you can never go wrong betting on the idiocy of athletes.

I lay this squarely at the feet of the NCAA - no way would this have happened if college athletes were paid.

Isn’t “produce terrible content but still be popular” Gawker’s business model?

So does that mean that Ryan Shawcross is a hero now?

If he’s lucky he’ll stay on the Vikings and get to blow another playoff game 5 years later. This is also know as the “Nate Kaeding.”

A number? Really? The chances of children getting injured on the drive is probably a thousand times higher (at least) than getting kidnapped in a stolen car.

With a couple more blown playoff games he can get to the Nate Kaeding level!

You might be right but it certainly looks like (from the gif above) that he purposely sticks out his bat to hit the ball. But you can’t judge intent obviously.

Isn’t this exactly the kind of tackle they are trying to get rid of? Leading with your head? Even the messed up NCAA made this kind of hit illegal.

Driving a truck and flying a jet and completely different than being a Marine grunt as those jobs don’t require much physical strength. I’m not sure people realize how heavy the average combat load is - there just isn’t going to be more than a handful of women that can handle it. And the women that can are going to…

I’m curious on why you think women will get better compared to men in the future, do you have any reasoning for that or is that just an opinion? Here’s another example, let’s say that the NBA forced each team to play a woman player - it’s obvious that a team with a woman would be much worse than an all-male team. Yet…

Right, it’s not like there’s a war going on or anything....wait, there is? Well I don’t know anybody that serves so who cares if they get killed.

Make a rifle platoon of women? You do realize there probably aren’t 42 women in the whole US military that could meet the standard and probably most of them wouldn’t volunteer anyway.

Can the non-hitting batter touch a ball in play? It looks like he deliberately touches the ball but I wouldn’t think that would be legal.

Why did the non-batsman stick out his bat to hit that ball? Is that legal? I’m assuming he did that to keep the bowler from catching it but I wouldn’t think that would be legal.

As a San Diego resident I hope it’s the Chargers!

Netflix or Serial should get to the bottom of this!

So this is just like the Occupy Wall Street protests except with more guns and less rapes, right?

Of course he’s not an odd freak, I mean there must be dozens of people in the world that are 7’3”!

Wait, politicians lie? Thanks for shattering my world Will. Dumbass Cardinals homer.