You mean like in pretty much every major city... where we already have them for the trolleys?
scarr
scarrmrcc
And then, to save weight, we make them use the same crank, and engine parts.
we can call it the v8!
Boost.
That is the thing about boost... it adds more air for the sole purpose of being able to burn more fuel. So, yeah, it is a 2.7l engine, but under boost it drinks like a 5+l engine. and since it doesn’t make as much torque, it has to be geared lower to move, and thus at higher speeds, is running more revolutions…
radio waves only travel at the speed of sound.. and we all know base-model cobalts can easily exceed the speed of sound.
“It wasn’t our fault that lady stepped out in front of a moving car.. it was Uber’s.”
Man, (in the gif) that lady got the WEIRDEST erection.
plastidip is cheap, and easily acquirable.. especially in black.
That is why I bought an ssr rowdy. (think of the honda big ruckus, but with an air cooled 150cc motor).
cost me $800 (used with 44 miles on it)
gets 80mpg.
does 51mph (then the rev limiter kicks in)
centrifugal clutch, mated to a cvt tranny.
my commute is 14 miles each way.
costs $99 to insure for year in the philly area.
fun…
There is a real good chance it just plastidip.
Imagine you are trying to take off a really stubborn bolt or nut (such as a car lugnut) and it stuck. so you put your wrench on it, and hit the wrench with a hammer to get that extra “break free” force. that is what an impact driver does... but it is like hitting the wrench 10 times a second.
Imagine you are trying to take off a really stubborn bolt or nut (such as a car lugnut) and it stuck. so you put…
What is the rice for, if you going to strain it out anyway?
But.. it ISN’T a cash grab. Think about it, what percentage of cars on the road are 20 years or older? From what some studies found, it seems about 5% of cars NATIONWIDE (so this includes the non rust areas) are 20 years old or older.
This is about one thing, and one thing only: fining the poor, for being poor.
(I…
He said trunk, not Frunk.
Why?
EVERY comment is furthering the misinformation BS. that this article is based on. the article ITSELF is spam.
It DOES that it applies to MANUFACTURERS. it DOESN’T apply to YOU.
you see there are these things in legal documents represented by numbers, and titles, and such that show that is not a stand alone thing.
it is a part of a set of regs that apply things that are prohibited by manufacturers when applying for EPA…
I need that degree!
Thing is.. follow the “rabbit hole”
this doesn’t apply to anyone OTHER than manufacturers.
WHY:
it is an addition to the subset of rules that concern certification waivers, it is the prohibited from the waivers. NOT prohibited in the country.
go to the sections it references in the regulations it says, and you will see.
Wha…
lets literally read what it says:
§ 86.1853–01 Certification hearings.
If a manufacturer’s request for a
hearing is approved, EPA will follow
the hearing procedures specified in 40
CFR part 1068, subpart G.
■ 67. Section 86.1854–12 is amended by
adding paragraph (b)(5) to read as
follows: § 86.1854–12 Prohibited acts.
* * * *…
lets literally read what it says:
§ 86.1853–01 Certification hearings.
If a manufacturer’s request for a
hearing is approved, EPA will follow
the hearing procedures specified in 40
CFR part 1068, subpart G.
■ 67. Section 86.1854–12 is amended by
adding paragraph (b)(5) to read as
follows: § 86.1854–12 Prohibited acts.
* * * *…