I was talking about Bradford Galt, who clearly didn’t.

This is the part where someone could legitimately say “did you read the whole article or just the title”.

With such a severe lack of influence and institutional knowledge at the top of the food chain, IndyCar was destined to languish. Bernard was worthless, and while Miles was far better (though that’s not saying much), they just couldn’t pull in the sponsorships or the coverage.

False equivalencies don’t prove an argument when you’ve got nothing left.

Try again:

Yeah, no. That means there has been 23 years of intervening data to refute their original findings. I know it’s strange, but things have a tendency to change.

I love how the internet give people like you the ability to believe and think that you know what you are talking about, when you so clearly don’t. You are an idiot.

Got it. We cool.

Everything you just said is completely idiotic. 99.9% of the time, the “Several hundred people with be hurt or killed today on something that you or one of your colleagues designed” did not happen because of a design defect. It happened because people don’t obey the laws governing their use.

Yeah, I’m feeling that heat now . . .

Like I said, no one gives a shit about Australia. This isn’t an Australian issue.

If users controlled or abused what structural engineers designed as they do what traffic engineers design, you’d have buildings falling down daily.

Title had nothing to do with fault; that would have been the first indication I read the article.

California.

Citation or gtfo.

I’ve yet to see that in any police report I’ve ever read, and I’ve read thousands. Then again, I’m in California, and when a ped is already in a crosswalk, that’s sacred and cannot be violated.

Cool, we’ve moved on to attacking my credentials to refute my opinions. Just for the record, I’m a registered Traffic Engineer with the State of California, which requires separate licensure of my Civil Enigneering license with the State of California. But I digress.

I didn’t realize Australia was the archetype for the United States. I can get statistics to say whatever I want if I pick the right ones.

Hey, fuck you for thinking “fuck you” is an appropriate response to someone who has an opinion that differs from yours. My sincerest condolences for having triggered you.