Cars from the 80s and 90s were genuinely interesting - they came in many shapes and sizes, they had quirky characteristics, splashy graphics, and early electronics. Some didn’t age well but it was all interesting. Also, these cars were still dangerous - many would willingly kill you for a driving mistake, and that…

Because cars from the 80s/90s:

The ‘T’ stands for TURBO

Stopped reading at “weight does not matter.”

How dense must the M2 be?

Jalopnik: Not giving readers the whole picture since 2011.

“He has transcended humanity and become a godlike car person.”

As clickbait as it gets.

People who call car enthusiasts “posers” if they’re not adhering to their purity tests are judgy and insecure, and spend too much time worrying about how other people enjoy their own cars.

That is completely incorrect. I suggest you look at the primary source of data itself. There is no deep analysis of actual component failures in the drivetrain. The report simply analyzed the four lines of data:

This is the exact quote you mis-interpreted:

So, I may be drunk, or maybe this entire article is just fluff.... but what part is it that fails? All auto’s have one major weak point in them that is the most likely cause of breakage. Needless to say this article is VERY general for this sort of site. What part fails at 60k? Who the F is plug in america and green…

this comment is slightly lacking in Pantera.

NSX

Year one: What’s the NSX? Is that the cute little Acura SUV?

Clip

Would like to see more of this car than just this single picture that doesn't even show more than 2/3 of the entire car.