You are incorrect. A prosecutor should know that “what happens in front of your house” is, in fact, police business. Inside your house? Your business. Your back yard? Mostly your business. But what happens in front of your house is always police business.

Sounds like you are one massive hypocrite. I bet you 20 bucks, you would have zero problems what so ever using a ring video to convict a criminal but god forbid they have access to YOUR ring to help do the same thing.

More than anti-Ring, the site is seriously anti-law enforcement. Which is funny, because they’re much into gun control and gun confiscation, things for which you need law-enforcement. And don’t get me started with the Green New Deal thing, which Gizmodo loves. Just think of all the policing that will need to be done…

Man, this website has a serious hard-on anti-ring, has for almost a year now. Pretty absurd honestly. I love mine and really don’t give a damn about any of this, nor do the vast majority of owners. 

The whole point of ring is security. Very few people who own one are worried that the police get the footage. Should they improve their data security? Absolutely. But that’s always going to be a moving target. And the Neighbors bit is also a huge selling point. You are warning people away from the things they actually…

GUUUUUUH I’m so tired of answering this question. The sources are not hard to find if you look.