I never denied I had any bias. If everyone has unconscious biases they haven’t explored, you do too, regardless of the biases you purport to have admitted to. 

I dunno what else to tell you. I have no reason to believe Judge is lying when he says he doesn’t remember the night in question, as I’ve stated multiple times. Are you trying to convince me that he is? It literally doesn’t matter to me. Him saying he doesn’t remember the night in question doesn’t change my view of…

I mean, Judge’s statement was under oath. In any event, his statement was that he did not remember the night in question. I believe that. He could be lying, of course, but I have no reason to believe he is, and frankly, him not remembering the night in question has no real bearing on whether I find Blasey Ford’s…

I’m not sure how that doesn’t answer your question? He didn’t submit to further questioning beyond submitting a sworn statement, and I believe him when he says he doesn’t remember anything from that night. In reality, the fact that he didn’t submit to further questioning has no bearing on whether I believe him when he…

There’s an awful lot of speculation in that first paragraph! Including that recounting a time your sister or friend was raped, she told you, and you feel you insufficiently supported her, could not be a traumatic thing that you would not want to recount multiple times to people you think aren’t sympathetic. In any…

Of course there is a possibility Reade is lying. There is also a possibility Blasey Ford is lying, that Paula Jones lied, that Juanita Broadrick lied, that Anita Hill lied. You don’t know what happened in any of those cases. In all of them, only two people were direct witnesses to what happened.

The witness either confirmed Reade’s story or didn’t. I don’t think any bias Grim might have play into it, unless you are accusing Grim of making up the corroboration.

I didn’t say she didn’t say one of those things because it “doesn’t jibe,” I said it because she literally didn’t say. But even if she did, there just is no inconsistency there, because the thing you are saying she said is only speculation about something she had no personal knowledge of. Biden can have sexually…

Okay, we’ve established that you think the thing you think she said speculating about Biden’s state of mind could not actually have accurately reflected his state of mind over 25 years before she said it.  And?  That doesn’t mean either (1) she’s actually wrong about what his state of mind is and (2) even if she is,…

Literally, she didn’t say that. The thing in quotes, she never said it. That’s why I said she didn’t say that, because she didn’t, and I do things like “point out facts.” But even if she did, there is not anything “self-contradictory” about it, and there’s nothing about that statement that makes it less likely that…

Nope. I don’t agree that statement doesn’t make sense, but even if it doesn’t, it doesn’t matter at all. Whether her speculation and projection that Biden might not know why she left if he had sexually assaulted her has absolutely nothing to do with whether he actually assaulted her.  Your reason for not believing…

The crux of your argument remains that she’s bad at projecting what Biden’s personal feelings and knowledge are. Your account of how Biden would react to her leaving, and her account, are only projections. I fundamentally disagree that her projection doesn’t make sense, but even if it doesn’t, so the fuck what? It…

She didn’t say the second one. She only said the first one, in which she was conveying a narrative which she deliberately omitted her claim of sexual assault. That speculation about Biden’s thoughts and feelings, again, not based on any personal knowledge whatsoever (and not purporting to be) could simply be a…

Maybe he would or maybe not, but the most you are accusing her of is not being consistent in her speculation about Biden’s assumptions and inner feelings. Even if you think her earlier speculation about what Biden would have been thinking, so what?  It is speculation about something she has no personal knowledge of.…

Those brothers are grifters. Thankfully they've been banned on Twitter. Yet is seems they continue to exist on medium. 

There is no contradiction. She was fired from Biden’s office. That’s what she says in both places. In the April 2019 story, the one that you think forms the basis of the contradiction, she says she was fired from Biden’s office because of her efforts to push back against his actions that made her uncomfortable.  She…

Lol, what? Your whole claim this entire thread was that there was some contradiction between one claim that she resigned and another claim that she was fired. As it turns out, she said she was fired in both. So now, you are trying to manufacture a contradiction where none exists. She said she was fired both times! She…

Did you read the article? Did you read the source articles that supposedly form the basis of the contradiction? Here’s an excerpt from the April 6, 2019 article:

The Washington Post discussed Reade’s claims at the time they came out:

I dunno. It seems newsworthy when a woman, on the record, under her own name, comes out and publicly makes an accusation of sexual assault agains the presumptive Democratic nominee, and it seems possible to responsibly present those accusations with all of the relevant caveats if the original source didn’t take…