saruman3600
saruman3600
saruman3600

Well when Rockstar time and time again nerfs mission payouts to try to get you to buy Shark Cards then yes, I don’t blame people for stop trying. Doing missions is pointless, the payout just isn’t worth it.

That generation certainly did love blowing stuff up.

Yeah I’m waiting on it to be a little further along in development as well. I’m usually not into buying early access games right away. I did the same thing with Subnautica, tried it when it initially came out, didn’t like how unfinished it felt, and now just the other day purchased it, since it’s almost ready for its

Yeah lol, his comment annoyed me because people have assumed the same things about me in the past. Assuming that because I was a few months behind on my electric bill but had a tv, phone, game console and internet that I was spending foolishly, even though I have had that stuff for years now *rolls eyes*

Maybe he/she posted that from a friend or family members house using their computer and internet. On that income you can fit internet into your monthly expenses if you really try, maybe the building comes with free internet and they’re posting from a cheap, used netbook. So many possibilities, don’t just assume the

American Imperialism? lol that’s a good one. Please elaborate.

Well there have been stories of so called male “feminists” being found guilty of sexual harassment so..... it’s sort of already happened, just not necessarily on these sites.

So basically it’s dirt cheap for Sony to be able to run these servers if they wanted to? That’s my takeaway from your comment.

You would think it’s why we pay for PSN but apparently not.

Is running servers expensive though? Especially for a game that doesn’t have that many players anymore you would think it would be dirt cheap to run them because there’s so few people using them. I would think they could just keep a skeleton crew around to keep them running. Of course I know nothing of running servers

I’ve shown another heretic the error of his ways :)

It isn’t that you don’t want to rehash this argument, you just have no comeback because you know everything I said in my last comment is the truth. Look I get it, you’ve got a bone to pick with “Microsoft fans” but that doesn’t mean you have to try and defend how shit PSN was back in the day. You come across as

Which half was that? You clearly never owned a PS3 because if you did then you would know that PSN was down every other week for a day for “maintenance”. Now that Sony is charging for PSN it’s a better service, not much better but at least it’s stable now. But stay blinded to the truth, maybe someday you’ll take the

lol and I’m definitely not a “Microsoft fan”, I like Xbox but I have my criticisms of them the same I do Sony and Nintendo.

Cross game voice chat, stable servers, are the two big ones, and yeah, the third option is because we really have no choice in the matter if we want to play online with our friends. But guess what, I’d rather pay 50 bucks a year for that stuff rather than it be free. With a free service you get things like Steam and

Maybe not for you, but to many others it was.

Did they? That’s good to hear because the game looks really fun but I don’t want to buy it if it was still an issue.

Well, better online though, back then you could definitely tell that PSN was a ”free” service. Now that Sony is charging for their online it’s a better service than what PS3 had.

I’ve actually picked up a third job too right away, the first 2 jobs to buy the system and the third job to afford some games

$599 for a PS3 at launch. I was simply saying I still think sony’s ego tops Microsoft’s by a small margin.