The one where I didn’t even remotely imply otherwise?
The one where I didn’t even remotely imply otherwise?
“One final question - how long is the appropriate amount of time cops have to suffer fools who want to be a PITA?”
Counterpoint: fuck him.
Thanks - that all sounds just fine to me!
Yeah, I can’t wait for the joint lawsuit filed by 15 GOP state attorneys general seeking an injunction against this rule.
How do you like the Equinox EV so far? I’m really interested in that one.
hahahahahahahahahahahaha
A fair point.
As long as the person sitting in the car still gets fully ticketed, okay, I guess, that can stay buyer/user beware.
Incurring multiple criminal charges and a whole lot of money problems when everyone involves successfully sues your ass off, while ripping off the door of your own vehicle, rather than just paying the towing fee: When Keeping It Real Goes Wrong.
Sure, and in this instance the guy who also said “I just don’t picture a blue guy driving a f— Scout” is clearly a red guy.
“As for Ray, who is selling another Scout — a rare 1978 version priced at $59,999 — he didn’t want to talk politics, which he called “a tough topic.””
Ah, spotted an embarrassed Trump voter!
I’m not him, but I presumed that was a response to the two questions posed at the end.
For the towing part, I agree it’s possibly concerning, but I’d imagine the argument is probably spoliation of evidence if they don’t secure and retrieve it ASAP.
““How can anybody afford that?”
Particularly annoying that Jalopnik keeps doing this, especially here where, for instance, later on they didn’t say “GM lost $8 billion on Cruise.”
I don’t always say this, but it’s worth checking that commenter’s post history before crafting a serious response to them.
No they haven’t.
I really, really, really wish they’d name that Foxconn site “Scott Walker Park.”
“Courtney Loveseat” is amazing.