Originally it shot at Russia (USSR, then) first specifically in order to guarantee that the counterstrike would wipe out the U.S., so I think it’s got it well in hand.

What an odd question.

That said, it should be extremely obvious to all that, true to form, if it did manage to achieve sentience it would definitely hate people enough to immediately launch a nuclear strike.

Might have been their rivals Duh, Doy & Derp.

“investors are getting worried that big boss Elon Musk is distracted”

The only reason anyone remembers the DeLorean itself is because an all-time great sci-fi trilogy was made with it as essentially the butt of a joke.  I propose the same for the Cybertruck!

Let’s presume, for the purposes of discussion here, that they did comply with those regulations and the CT does have an internal escape latch.  Would we trust it to actually work?

I am 100% sure that we will someday learn the CT started as a drunken cocktail napkin doodle from Elon, and in his exaggerated pride he refused to allow any modifications after he’d sobered up (if he did).

In a cult, which that is, voicing even the tiniest question as to Leader’s perfection is heresy and a reasonably big deal in context.  Sure, you hope for more, but still worth noting.

Them.

Jeez, and I thought I was being pedantic!

As long as the explosion didn’t involve fission, no matter was truly destroyed, so technically

Maybe it’s a Tesla boat.

Same here, although I’m curious to read the book at some point too.  The movie’s ending was perfect, and funny as hell.

“’Never drive uphill, me boys.’ -Robert E. Lee” - Donald J. Trump

On the other hand, the video of him saying these things all in a row makes it quite clear that he’s stating it as a direct contrast to Taylor Swift.  It doesn’t sound the tiniest bit ambiguous.

You unintentionally made a causation statement there.

It’s the “actually” that’s the problem there, as it so often is.  It makes the statement a contrast rather than a declaration.

I suppose, since it’s in the context of more efficient energy use anyway, we could fuck it off into the cold depths of Jupiter instead.  But otherwise agreed.

Maybe it’s that the lawyer knows perfectly well you’re not getting much more than actual damages for a situation that you can’t describe as more than “potentially life-threatening.”