What part of that sentence was confusing to you?  

“That driver made it two miles with Mendez on the hood of their Civic before they stopped and removed his body from the car, continuing on their way.”

Not even the tiniest bit confusing.

“uninsured driver that caused the collision”

Of fucking course this idiot was uninsured.  Jesus.

Why should it always be so mysterious?

I do like the idea that it is now judicial precedent that evangelicals consider lying to be a fundamental aspect of their religious practice.

“when he inadvertently packed his revolver inside his carry-on luggage”

Bullshit.  Bullshit bullshit bullshit.

Welp.

Always remarkable to hear of a guy like this still pleading “not guilty.” My man, you literally recorded every detail, inside and out, of you committing the crimes for which you are being charged. If ever there was a time to throw yourself on the mercy of the court, it is this time.

My older kid noticed this last night - she exclaimed “my controller is playing music!” and the younger one and I didn’t believe her immediately until we did it again and listened.  Very cool.

Certainly makes for efficient disposal of the now-wrecked car!

Well, they can all sort that out in the fucking wood chipper.

Agreed - I think that taking too long at a protected left turn arrow, especially if you’re in the front of the line, should be eligible for corporal punishment.

“We?” “Our?” said every single other employee who had no choice but to follow through with their insane boss’s cocktail napkin drawings.

I do think it’s particularly illustrative that they don’t even respect the outcomes of their own internal elections.

People who think they have a stop sign but actually don’t.  

Always love these supposed defenders of freedom going out of their way to restrict the rights of others to even leave. 

Sure, just as long as you acknowledge your first post’s difficulty with the concept of linear time.

I definitely share the joy of seeing him in flames, but the idea of him NEVER getting the chair depends on the spines of a non-zero number of Congressional Republicans, which is not something I’d ever feel good about betting upon.  

“I could have stopped our conversation about a bipartisan cycle of violence in it’s tracks to clarify that, no, not “all” of the Democrats voted for war. Simply “most” of them did. Would that have made you happy?”

I’m honestly just curious why instead of making what could have been a fair point you exaggerated it into something demonstrably wrong.