You do if the vehicle gets hit hard enough by something big enough to rip the entire thing to shreds.

After watching the trailer, agreed.  That’s my final answer, locking it in.

Think of it like this: the control stick is either controlling the front of your head or the back of your head.  If you select inverted, it’s controlling the back of your head, so up moves your view down, etc., and otherwise it’s controlling the front of your head.

“is being held at Dauphin County Prison without bail after a district judge ruled there are no conditions Davis can meet to be released at this time”

Good.  A guy like this would absolutely be a danger to her if released.

The exception that proves the rule!

“whining is bad!!!” whines the dipshit who does literally nothing else.

He is an employer, though, as noted in the linked Intercept article and the complaint itself.

“a technical violation of NLRA”

Also known as “a violation of NLRA.”

Yeah, like when they realized that a public ledger of every single transaction was actually really, really, really useful to investigators.

I always love when someone screams “THAT WAS OUT OF CONTEXT” and then when they provide the context it doesn’t actually help the statement in question even a tiny little bit.

“Also, whatever happened to corrections/updates when new information comes out?”

“but Musk questioned the media outrage about the murder. ► AND NOTHING ELSE”

What’s there to be outraged about?  That’s the bullshit assumption.

Ah, so you also agree that the police involved deserve hatred and threats.

*

You, friend, appear to be a staggering moron who does not understand the concept of linear time.

Why would there be any outrage here?  

And as such, that’s exactly the kind of case that class-actions are best-suited for: one where any given individual harm is so small that the company figures no one is going to feel it’s worth complaining about their deceptive actions.  A big part of the point of class-actions is to be punitive in order to dissuade…

I guess my point is: neither is slamming on the brakes every time a car is at, approaching, or even still moving at a crossroad.

I guess that’s what I get for responding to “just to start an argument,” isn’t it.  In any event, I used “presume” rather than “assume” purposefully for that exact reason.

I think there’s a much simpler explanation: the truck driver reasonably presumed that the car was about to pause/stop in the median until the way was clear.