Or just torpedo it.

Ah, dammit, I knew I didn’t have it quite right.  Still, it’s been billions of years, so perhaps they’ve upgraded?

I think “Fraud” works better for the last part, but otherwise no notes.

It’s House GOP members, though, so we knew that already.

It’s funny that it’s (almost?) all hearsay as well.  

Like Kodos and Kang dousing Homer in rum so that no one will believe him.

If one happens to be a Scientologist, yes.

“Don’t even suggest this “what if” scenario. Sure, it “could” pass, but it won’t. Not if 60% is required. All of the recent polling data suggests support for the abortion rights amendment sits pretty solidly at 57-58%. To my knowledge, not a single poll of likely voters has the issue breaking the 60% threshold.”

That…

Perfectly captured by stating that Ken would “play his guitar at you.”

Plus, if you’re planning to film in front of an old courthouse in the South, odds are probably pretty damn good that you’ll land on the site of a lynching whether you meant to or not.

RULES??? In Freedomland?  I don’t think so.

“On the gripping hand”

I thought I was the only one nerdy enough to have ever made that reference, until now.

We should be so lucky.

Have a sufficient number of people noted that you obviously failed to read the article yet, or will one more help?

That there is no bigger group of suckers than right-wingers who actually fucking went for this “hey, instead of buying one movie ticket, why not buy two?” thing.

You know what’s funniest about this comments section?  The startling number of comments exactly like Patricia’s that are clearly written by some Trumpist dummy that heard about this article in a Facebook handwringing group and came here to register burner accounts under their real names to be mad about it.

I think the astroturfing aspect is somewhat surprising, although less so since it’s a right-wing thing than it might have been otherwise.

Give it time.

It’s impressive that relative to those three, he’s 1) done tremendous damage to the platform itself by firing almost everybody, 2) done tremendous damage to the user base in a variety of ways, and 3) is now finishing the trifecta by nuking the brand.

Between the headline and the lead image, I really thought this article was going to be about some rude NASA transporters mocking an innocent asteroid sample, and thought that seems a bit mean for NASA.