Bet a whole lot of Ray middle names in that crowd.

You say “or”, I’d be fine with “and.”

Wow, you type really well for someone born in 2015.

The men are of the type that don’t know how dumb they actually are, and thus don’t try to pretend that they’re smarter than they actually are. Ivanka’s the type of dumb that on some level realizes it, thus her attempts to appear to be functional at a human level. The problem is that she’s bad at that, too.

“Ever so begging your pardon, my Lady Ivanka, but wouldst thou shut the fuck up about everything?”

Surely one of your spectacular intellectual gifts would agree that there’s a difference between “thinking that’s the most likely cause” and “that was my first thought,” though, right?

No, I don’t get why you are so astonished that someone’s first thought could be one of the possibilities that certainly could have happened. It’s really weird that you took such umbrage with that. I’m astonished that it was astonishing to you. But that’s fine. (edit: ahahahaha, holy shit the “critical thinker” part.)

That doesn’t explain why you seemed so astonished that someone could immediately wonder if there had been foul play, though. Sure, it’s a less likely outcome, but why on earth would it be weird for the mind to go there? It is that odd to you that someone could immediately think of something that certainly could have…

Given the limited information first presented, how is it “holy shit” material to have one’s first thought be foul play? Genuinely curious here.

Send me all those worthless dollars and pounds, then.

Contrary to popular belief, lawyers are not big fans of taking on unwinnable cases with nightmare clients that will require a ton of work and come with awful publicity.

Trump’s “doctor”.

Eric! What’s it like?

First time on record for either fanbase that a case of burning loins wasn’t STD-related.

I hadn’t until a couple of months ago - check it out. It’s really good.

Look how dumb you are. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sexual%20assault

I really like Franken, and was incredibly disappointed when his conduct came to light (not just because I thought he’d be a good 2020 candidate), but her “he didn’t get to tell his side of the story” line is nonsense. He did get to tell his side of the story - he said “I did these things and I shouldn’t have.” Going…

I mean, the alpaca loses hair so that the robe might live, so maybe.

This sounds like an argument that we shouldn’t consider a black female nominee because of those racists, but I know that can’t be what you actually mean.