I mean, human traffickers are, presumably.

She will start with the terrible problem of advanced-middle-aged semi-billionaires trafficking in Eastern European models to serve as arm candy/inheritance rivals.

Breakup of the nation into smaller bodies less willing and capable of inflicting irreversible global harm.

Especially now that they have 100% abandoned the idea that qualifications should enter into the analysis.

As always, just imagine what this asshole is like when he’s not on camera.

It’s pretty astonishing to me that he managed to avoid simply calling her “uppity,” since it’s clearly the word he was looking for.

“I don’t see anything wrong with this situation”

Okay, try imagining the kids were white. 

If the last nine years have taught us anything, it is that these people absolutely hate black people and women more than they care about themselves.

Stop trying to show me a silver lining here, man!

I’ll believe that Republican Senators have spines to vote against the bill when and if they actually do it, and not a moment before, thanks.

Ah, historic Tunt Manor!

And “Off” is my favorite TV channel!

They do, but they do not use them to see or listen.

Christ, of fucking course he wears tighty whities.

You did too, fellow American.

Prove us wrong, Indiana.

No, Steve Bannon just looks like he’s 71.

My kids are still young enough (5 & 7) that they think the world of me and that I can do no wrong, etc. I am so so so excited for when they get old enough that I can embarrass them just by existing. I’m going to be awesome at that.

I’m going to pick this one out of the predictable responses to answer, since I’ll get the chance to inform you that I in fact voted for Sanders in the primary before voting for Clinton in the general.

“The other problem is: will GOP congresspeople actually vote against this bill and in favor of what’s actually good for their constituents, or will they simply put party over people yet again and push this through?”

That’s a rhetorical question, right?