It’s also called “avoiding malpractice” - always include everyone who could possibly be even the tiniest bit involved in the initial complaint, lest your client ask you later why you didn’t. (edit: although certainly must consider/include/balance against professional duty not to make frivolous filings in this…

The GOP has the easier job there - it’s far simpler to design short memorable catchphrases for idiots than to speak to actual reasonable humans.

“Nowhere in the article did it claim anyone talked about that, though, so I’m not sure why you’re making an unrelated argument.”

A glance at that one’s posting history should answer the question, although it’s very unpleasant.

Right, the higher up you go in that culture the less even its own rules apply.

They’re a group that views abject obedience, or at least the appearance of doing so, as a virtue.  Like how they do shitty racist asshole things all week and then swear in church on Sunday (if they go) that they’re totally following the example of Christ and so forth.

You certainly didn’t, but I will indeed move on.

But his lie was “I’m not in Spider-Man: No Way Home”, which is lying about being in a movie.  Why is that bad?

I have zero doubt whatsoever that we’re eventually going to find out that no small number of them were cops.

That’s a tautology.  Why is lying about being in a movie bad?

“lying to prevent spoilers is bad”

Why?

Thought your whole complaint was that he wasn’t providing info on Twitter, so there you go.

Answer my question first!

“because people will talk about it, and generate free advertising for him”

$3.5 mil is a heck of a lot to spend for free advertising.

Seriously, though, when all that info is already easily available to anyone accessing a device that can also access Twitter, why is that necessary?

Although the new big-ass “MSG Sphere” is going up on the line, so maybe that’ll help.

This is exactly why the correct response if someone asks if you’d managed to avoid Covid so far is “As far as I know.”  

Evergreen comment.

It’s the players, or rather, the people garbageposting on Reddit.  But I do love a good rhetorical question, so kudos to you for that.

“She tried to use his fame for clout”

Oh come on.  She was talking about a thing while filming the show on a podcast about the show.

Although they do keep repeating Trump’s furious missives scribbled on a notepad, for some reason.  I’d love them to completely ignore those going forward as well.