I'll take one… after a Rucka omnibus. Really, it's a crime how many major WW runs are flat-out out of print right now.

That's fair! It's not perfect, and like basically every WW run, it is more concerned with reinventing the wheel in an attempt to 'fix' things than with building on top of what's already there, which can make it feel a bit stilted. It's not perfect, it's just my personal favorite.

I have a lot that I like - Simone, Azzarello, Perez - but Rucka's was THE Wonder Woman run for me, is what I meant.

Yeah. I was just so excited for the whole 8House experiment, and so sick of the publishing schedule they settled on. I'm still sticking with From Under Mountains, but only barely.

Meanwhile, his Wonder Woman is the only run I've read of the character that I did think was legitimately great.

If it isn't canceled yet, I suspect it will be when DC announces their REBIRTH lineup. It's selling 10k copies a month; that's looooooooow cancellation territory, barring a HUGE digital/bookstore readership.

Pretty Deadly #8: Gorgeous.

No, thank you.

Disney/Marvel had two rules for them: No use of the word fuck and no straight-up nudity. I'd be shocked if the Mouse House ever relaxed those restrictions for Marvel stuff.

And then there's this line, from this very episode…

I'm sure this list is fine, but the lack of Hamilton is a pretty big strike against it.

The Vision is very, very quickly becoming Marvel's best book. Or at least tied with The Unbeatable Squirrel Girl. Alongside Grayson and Midnighter, I know I'll have something excellent to read most weeks.

Man, how great is UnREAL?

I won once, like 6 years ago. They never informed me by e-mail; I just received a bunch of DVDs in the mail like 6 weeks later and had no idea why.

I don't disagree that it's probably best practices to say so, but I also don't think it's necessary on an ad. If this were a review or a critical piece, absolutely, yes. Maybe that's just my low opinion of advertising sneaking in, but… I just don't think an ad is less ad-like because it's a friend's book/business.

And that's fine. But I think it's insulting to pretend like they're posting a preview - not a review, as you misleadingly say - of the last issue of a critically acclaimed run of comics because of teh ethics in comics journalism rather than because it's the last issue of a critically acclaimed run of comics that they…

Uh, yeah, just because you disliked it, corruption is the only explanation.

She does some occasional articles, which is why the AVC never reviewed her run on Catwoman, if I recall correctly.

But it wasn't his campaign. He might not come out flawlessly, but he has a measure of distance from that - a husband going behind his back to help his wife. There is no such distance in Peter's campaign; either he's corrupt or he's incompetent.

If Eli brings up the stolen Gubernatorial election, HIS career is sunk just as much as Peter's, because he was running that campaign. He needs to destroy Peter with things that he himself didn't have a hand in.