So they're genuinely letting Uproxx write their headlines now?

I think Amy Brenneman and Landecker could play convincing sisters.

The IBFCBA? Ha! They're toothless!

Exactly! It was never meant to be like this. We're above all this aren't we?

These Uproxx-y/Buzzfeed-y headlines make me wince. Even though this one, in the context of a new show kind of makes sense, I can't stand the use of the word 'need' in this stuff. Ahhh who cares. I should delete this post because it's whiney and in the grand scheme of things no one should give a shit. Thers's more…

I'd totally watch this. Not at the movies but, y'know, on DVD or when it gets on Sky.

Agreed, like Dictatortot says below, it's kind of mystifying. Her impact when I first saw this was electrifying, more so than Watts for me. Shame.

Oh my word, Laura Harring. Overpoweringly alluring.

Can I be Bert Macklin FBI?

Even further than that, my sister and I still quote that line and I believe it's, "Souveneeeeers, novvvelties, parrrty treeeeks"

Can we also get rid of 'throwing shade'?

Straight Outta Uproxx.

MASCULINIDAD

This is a remarkable scene which I often talk about and champion to people and I'm really glad it's been picked out here for recognition as it's so brief, in the grand scheme of a full movie, it could easily get overlooked. For my money Hanks' best moment on screen.

What? They couldn't have dolly zoomed his reaction shot?

Is this the start of the rapture?

"My dog has no nose."
"How does he smell?"
"Well, I've implanted a small chip in his neck that does it for him"

What time does Sean Connery go to Wimbledon?

He'd be a great I Was There Too Guest.

Wait….is this an episode of 'Great Bits'??