No it isn't

If anything, this last year has only proven that self-driving cars won’t be viable on a massive scale for decades.

Literally the craziest Hypercar coming out. The engineering on this engine is in another league. Tested to 100k kilometers for reliability? Emissions legal? This doesn’t happen, but once in this lifetime.

At a quick glance I legitimately thought this was a Nissan Juke.

Considering California is the worlds 5th biggest economy and props up all those red states with their taxes I doubt they’re doing a lot of crying even in the face of massive wildfires. Though I’m sure you’re fine with people dying if they’re liberals.

Some shooting brakes are worth a lot of dough.

Am I alone in being completely underwhelmed by this thing?

Do you understand the difference between a loan and an investment?  I don’t think you understand the difference between a loan and an investment.  

flies

I’d be far more worried about the people in their 3-ton SUVs going twice the school speed limit while staring at their phone, personally.

As a California commuter let me tell ya theres no way a car without a driver is more dangerous than the average california driver

I root for anyone playing the Dodgers, so I’m okay with the result.;

I would just keep buying and selling John Cena’s Ford GT over and over again.

What about cars of THIS caliber?:

It’s all been down hill since the auto industry took away my ability to crank over my own motor. Now that was driving!

Whats so bad about helping a company you believe in? honestly?

One damn impressive boner

You said you would have no problem ramming them - presumably if you didn’t see a firearm. And whether you saw one or not, there’s a good chance you’d get shot.

Dafuq is this?

You have a Masters in PR?