I agree that baseball’s unwritten rules are some bullshit but they ain’t the reason that the game is “tired”.
I agree that baseball’s unwritten rules are some bullshit but they ain’t the reason that the game is “tired”.
Greg, the entire verse (or your nut) doesn’t need to be accomplished in the span of a single breath.
Football: Where HMS Super-Macho and the USS Mega-Gay pass one another quietly in the night.
Draper, thank you for your first good Kinja!
Congrats, textbook demonstration of entitlement by someone I would guess is opposed to government entitlements.
Another Webster definition where the phrase virulent racist is provided for context:
I’ll help you out.
‘“Virulently” when used in conjunction with “racist” is typically used to describe white supremacists or separatists,’
‘“Virulently” has a meaning, and I think the word was misapplied.’
Yes, I’m only looking at strikeouts vs. innings pitched b/c that is the most reliable way to measure a pitchers effectiveness. Almost “every other analytic” (besides FIP and SO/W, both of which Miller wins) rely upon the efficacy of their respective team’s defense. KC is clearly better defensively than NY thus ERA and…
Wade Davis is great but his 78 Ks in 67.1 IP vs. Miller’s 100 Ks in 61.2 IP gives the clear edge to Miller.
If you are an example of being “better” than the desperate and shallow left, I’ll double down on my own craven, petty brand of liberalism.
“but in the end, we really don’t give a shit because we’re not looking to those dudes for guidance.”
Ok, you’re giving even more than that initial shit now.
Obviously you give a shit since you read the article and commented on it as well.
I’m pretty sure this is just some sort of a ruse that you’re enjoying but it doesn’t matter, I have to hear more!
Do you work for the tobacco lobby or something?
Yes, liberals should be much more tolerant of bigots, homophobes, war profiteers and religious zealots. Truly no one deserves more patience, consideration and tolerance than these gentle souls.
No, still wrong. America does punish and outlaw bad opinions as well the release of verifiable fact under these legal precedents: fighting words, conspiracy, institutional oppression, sexual harassment, national security and information privacy (amongst many others).
Nope. I CAN decide which opinions are and aren’t valid. The government also CAN also decide what expression is valid or invalid: libel, slander, sedition, classified info, copyright infringement are all governmental regulations of free speech (those are just the tip of the regulatory iceberg too). American free speech…