The guy in the video’s was displayed differently, so there must be two -

The real purpose of Representatives is to give the people a voice within a republic system, so it is definitely worth it to try. If a rep gets a lot of calls on a specific issues, they will likely look deeper into the issue and may even alter their stance.

Jim Sterling put it well when he talked about the rise of walking simulators. You’re basically a spectator with no story to a far more interesting story that already happened/is happening. Just put us in the far more interesting story in the first place.

Not fake news, they’re just alternative facts. ;)

Because thought-policing is scary as fucking hell and nope-fuck-that-noise.

The same way Hillary and her supporters would rationalize anything the Communist Party USA says.

So based solely on someone’s beliefs, we should physically assault them? If someone is anti-gay marriage, I should beat the shit out of them until they change their mind? If someone voted for Gary Johnson, I should stab them for being libertarian?

That could pretty much be adapted to fit “mainstream” pornography (I’m talking the big names here) as a whole, to be honest.

Uncharted seems easier to adapt than an original video game world, since it’s pretty solidly based in reality (I think, I’ve never actually played it).

Trump strikes me as a “phone on the table and hunt-and-peck” kinda guy.

Sad!

I finally get to exploit my power as an ungreyed here!

We saw what we assume was a mule during a tour of Bowling Green assembly. It was in one of the distant dyno rooms, and the guide declined the question.

Ah, Overwatch is the only Blizzard title I’ve played, so I was unaware. Thanks!

Phew, that’s perfectly fair imo. It’s enough that most people will think about what they did, and probably not exploit glitches in the future. Especially if they are like me, and play almost every day.

I always spend all the money I receive from a hacker within about an hour. The common policy now is to make sure you don’t say anything about it in chat, because then they can and will actually ban you if you’re requesting it.

I’d say less “girly”, more “not trying to eat your face” like most other modern BMWs.

Eh, I feel it’s the same as using “whites”. Most black folks I know don’t mind it at all, but that’s not the group at large so I’m unsure of the overarching opinion on the term.

It’s an easily definable group of people, just like whites (nobody beyond the census bureau uses caucasian anyways, which implies they are from the Caucasus) . I find “African-American” silly, because they are Americans like everyone else who is a citizen and it implies that they are not fully American.

Personally, I stay away from the “it’s not consciously human” argument when debating the subject. For one, we can’t even really define what is going on in our brains that produces conscious thought processes, so until we understand that, we can’t claim anything either way about the fetus. The biggest reason, however,…