You're all fucking it up. Jesus, where's RoboDoakes when you need him?

It was on loan from Chris Brown.

It was a night of terrible performances. Like, some of the worst I've seen in years on the Grammy's. The only saving graces were Daft Punk and NIN/QOTSA - I'll even give Macklemore credit for making me somewhat interested in Macklemore (he kinda had a Brother Ali thing going on).

In all fairness, Arcade Fire played two songs in a row but your point is still valid. Last night it seemed egregious since I was actually enjoying the performance. Too bad Delta didn't interrupt some of the other performers.

Apparently the only Fleetwood Mac that anyone listens to now is Tusk on The Americans.

Haim's album from last year might be something of interest if you like layered pop songs.

I'm pissed that I'm still waiting for a proper Kill Bill release in Canada (and apparently everywhere else, too?).

When you compare the ad model to Ed Norton's physique when his shirt is off, they're pretty similar (toned arms, washboard abs). But muscle mass isn't the point and I highly doubt the subtext of the scene is only there based on a casting decision - it's very likely a deliberate choice to demonstrate the…

I'm just amusing myself now:

*Punctuated for clarity*

I think the film is smart enough to know that Tyler Durden and Fight Club are completely ridiculous - after all, the life-changing macho-pride being represented on the screen is rooted in the mind of a mentally ill man. For me, the satire is most obvious when Ed/Brad get on a bus and mock the underwear ad - even…

What does your girl instinct tell you?

In addition to obviously being about consumerism, VW Beetles and Ikea catalogs, the film is (for a large chunk of running time) also about extremity in groups. It does a good job of representing the processes of intense indoctrination and mob action. The whole "fight club" thing is essentially a terrorist group and…

Me guess infinitely better, nom nom nom.

It's a good film overall but the entire first act is spot on in it's depiction of severe depression. Things start to unravel a bit as soon as Ed Norton is sitting next to Brad Pitt on the airplane - it essentially becomes a type of he said/she said comedy once Helena Bonham Carter's character starts having a…

Canada's Premier Power Couple: Nickleback Edition

It's not circular, it's a matter of charisma being given higher priority than physical attractiveness. A male can be the most stunningly gorgeous person you've ever seen but that perception can change on a dime the instant he opens his mouth (or perhaps because he doesn't). This dynamic doesn't hold up nearly as well…

Attractiveness is subjective and it would seem most people here would assess Woody's looks at the lower end of the spectrum; the premise is that his attractiveness would include traits/qualities that are not based on his physical features (big ass dick excluded). I'm not one to judge his looks, I'm only pointing out…

Reality (and science) suggests males and females both use attractiveness as a criteria for selecting partners. One key difference is that females often also rely on perceived charisma as a selection criteria. Even when ratings of attractiveness decrease, males who are charismatic and charming are often still…

HBO gets it's fair share of criticism regarding the imbalance between portrayals of male and female nudity. I heartily agree there's no rationale for excluding male genitalia from the screen. After all, it's nothing we haven't seen before. But this isn't the real issue because there's one taboo body part with which…