samnada
onomatopatoot
samnada

I’m not wrong. Gun ownership has declined while mass shootings have increased. But we agree mass shootings are not the most significant gun problem. We need much stricter control of sales, registration, licensing, and ownership accountability. Cars have very legitimate purposes other than killing and maiming, and

Our gun laws are so spotty, weak and inconsistent that any correlation with laws in a specific state with mass shootings is highly suspect. The simple fact is if there were zero guns there would be zero gun deaths. The fewer guns and the more tightly we control ownership of guns the lower the chances of crazy people

That also smelled better and had a higher IQ.

Most Americans likely agree with you.

Your description of “Americans” is very simplistic.

Totally confirms how adamant I am that we need to be invoking Catch-45. Anyone so morally and intellectually bankrupt they would work for Trump is automatically disqualified from serving in the government.

As Dave Letterman once said, “I can’t blow my own horn, but if I could I certainly would.”

His military service and sacrifices do not mean he’s fit to represent the citizens of the country in Congress and make judgments about the laws we all must live under. He lost all credibility forever when he made the enormous error of selecting Sarah Palin to be the potential backup President. Time and again since

“I quote a pedophile protector on honor, dignity and respect, because I’m an agent of chaos.”

On second look I agree. That’s his underwear and a true-to-size boner.

Is it just me or is that a row of middle fingers and his hair in the middle, because he’s the center of the universe?

Nah, that’s because they can’t recognize a joke, and voted for one.

I can handle a pit, what I’d like to know is how to tell in the grocery store which ones are juicy and which are pithy.

Uh, here’s the actual statute:

“The tint of your skin, uh, ur, of your windows, yeah your windows might be too dark.”

Yeah, that’s better.

The more than obvious point here is Jr had every desire and intention of taking the treasonous, illegal action of putting personal gain above national interest by colluding with Russia to influence the election. And he acted on that intention. It also utterly defies belief that he invited Kushner and Manafort, both

“implemented himself”

If there really was no actual collusion it certainly wasn’t for lack of trying. Besides, Trump has made it crystal clear he welcomes cooperating with Russia in a deadly embrace to “prevent” cyber attacks, which just means he not only welcomes but is anxious to assist them with interfering in our next election on his

There are mistakes and there is negligence. Here’s what he was looking at: