samnada
onomatopatoot
samnada

Born and raised in FL. It’s not the heat, it’s the stupidity.

Define “lie”. By your definition any man who’s untruthfully answered the question “Does this make me look fat” three times is toxic. I would quibble. As with any complex issue there’s a simple formula that’s often too simple.

Fukushima will have a long legacy.

No one in the world dislikes Trump more than I do. But exaggerating ambiguous bits of “evidence” as being “the scariest yet” just hurts your credibility, which is really the only card you have to play. Unless you’re just in it for the clicks.

Gorsuch alone will likely do severe damage for decades. If he gets to appoint another SCOTUS justice there’s reason to think it would be truly catastrophic. He’s also in a position to appoint many other judges. Exiting the Paris agreement, and beginning the realignment of key partnerships between countries in the

Yeah it is that simple. You arguing she’s as bad as Trump. You’re crazy, and I’m done.

Total nonsense. She wasn’t “my candidate”, and it’s not “my Party”. To anyone sane she was the best viable option, by light years. She’s not close to my ideal candidate. That’s not relevant. Voting to allow a Trump presidency was sheer lunacy. And it is that simple.

Everyone is paying. That’s the problem. Nobody voted for Hillary? You mean other than the 3 million vote majority she got over Trump? Your argument is we’d be no better off with Clinton as President, so the result made no difference. That’s just patently absurd. My argument boils down to exactly what I stated,

Your take is predictably idiotic. Equating Clinton and Trump as equally bad is a spectacular failure of judgement. I can excuse voters who didn’t bother to go to the polls in States where Clinton had zero chance of losing given the Electoral College dynamics. Everyone else who didn’t vote for her is on the hook for

I like pie, pie is perfect, glorious pie. But you only offered cake, which isn’t nearly as good as pie. So I ate shit instead. So there!

That’s not what elected Trump. Blaming the better alternative for not being better enough, as if that justified voting for a total ignoramus, and allowing a catastrophe, is just stupid.

Sorry for the ambiguity. I meant the US being saved from being hijacked by lunatics.

Yeah, too bad serious voters didn’t save the country.

Invoke Catch-45. Anyone so morally bankrupt that they would work for Trump is automatically disqualified.

That’s ok, when you don’t have the facts try to change the subject. Again, your facts are wrong. The majority of Americans want federally funded universal health care coverage. Check the polls yourself. That’s going to happen eventually whether you like it or not. I’m sure you’ll be able to find a country that

“Our system is most efficient, you really don’t have a clue.”

Actually you’re a total idiot. I don’t use any drugs. And you’re wrong about drug use in Portugal. Lifetime experimentation is up somewhat, but chronic use is down over levels prior to decriminalization. And on the point of the article, i.e. drug deaths, Portugal’s system is light years ahead of ours.

You’re an excellent example of how bad our education system is as well.

Perhaps someone needs to spell it out for you. Our drug policies are horrific and are killing people. The answer is not to continue doing just what we’re doing and start withholding treatment to save money, it’s to completely change the way we manage people and drugs. Look at this chart:

Story I read said he had tested it with another book, and the bullet didn’t go through it. So I’d say it’s pretty safe to assume she thought it wouldn’t cause him serious injury. Obviously a tragic error in judgement by both of them, to put it mildly.