samjackandbess
PostApocalypticDog
samjackandbess

Cool, thanks. The A-7's always been one of my faves. It just looks cool!!

That matte black A-7 Corsair actually looks pretty damned sweet. I’ll take one!

They don’t believe war is a Call of Duty video game either.

We don’t lead the way any more.

Is there a better way to free a city from the terrorist vermin?

Don’t try to use logic with these keyboard warriors. Gets their panties all in a bunch.

Thank God.

LOL ... you’re so stupid it’s appalling.

And why are you and the Go-Murrica-Hillbilly crowd always defending Daesh?

Dude, it’s Raqqah they’re launching these rockets to.

That’s some Michael Bay shit right there. Love the new angle ... never seen that before.

Nope, you’re conflating an ongoing criminal case with the larger and totally separate issue of O/S security for everyone.

That’s the thing tho about him. In his eagerness to overcompensate, he fouls with no apparent concern of whether his foul could end a player’s season or even career. I mean, there are ‘dirty’ players like John Stockton or Dwayne Wade. But Dellavedova’s in a class by himself. He deliberately rolled over Kyle Korver’s

My underwear after I haven’t showered in two days is DIRTY.

The Cav’s Dellavedova is the guy in that pickup basketball game who you’d just like to knockout punch in the face, and then as you walk away everyone be like, “Nice.”

No, it can’t be ‘tweaked’ legally in other subsequent cases; nor can the precedent be used out of its specific context.

Sorry, but you’re applying theoreticals and speculation to a very specific situation. It doesn’t compute.

Any subsequent case requiring the same action would have to fulfill the conditions of THIS case in order to leverage any precedent:

The issue is contextualized within the San Bernardino shooting.

If you shot dead 14 innocent people and injured nearly 2 dozen more, yes, the government HAS the right to your personal correspondence, information and thoughts. This is the context of this particular issue.