This is Gizmodo, Right?

yeah, because fuck people that want to change the song they’re listening to WHILE STOPPED AT A LIGHT

What? They’ve already caught and locked up all the criminals in Canada? Nothing better to do? Priorities?

Title IX lawsuits coming in 3...2...1.....

.

One of three options:

“The point is that you almost have to get the warranty since the Mac is an investment. Again, the Chromebook is “disposable” so it’s completely fair to include the warranty in the price of the Mac.”

You mean like when the headline says “Conservative caught in sex sting” or “Trump supporter sends racist tweets” or maybe “Republican Senator indicted on money laundering charges”.

So you’re a big strong man who can handle coming across something potentially offensive without being upset because it’s just words.

They still don't have an actual production model for the Model 3

This is not demand, it's speculation.

Eat a dick, Barry.

That’s too bad, since Samer is acting like an asshole.

And hey, guess what? If you happen to click on the trending story “Captain America” in the Google News aggregator, this idiotically headlined story is right at the top.

Congrats, I guess? You got the pageviews you wanted, plus plenty more to come, and now even people who never even bothered stopping by…

Figure it out then, you’ve got a lot of people in favor of changing the article title, and a paid writer who acted unprofessionally. The title still hasn’t changed, which I think shows that you guys suppose that you’re right and doubling down based on principle.

It’s like some kind of civil... Disagreement.

Can we at least agree that the title of this post maybe isn’t the best and Samer’s comment was...unhelpful at best?

The way that you are defending it makes it crystal clear that the article’s title was a deliberate attempt to drive page views by people upset about the embedded spoiler.