saluk
saluk
saluk

Pretty lame to have to wait through 2 separate console release cycles and STILL have the game delayed.

I used to be a part of the Amiga master race, but by the time of Doom it was getting hard to believe in it anymore.

Interesting article! The man had not murdered anyone when he was wrestling. He was not a murderer. Logically, putting a representation of him in a game as he was before the horrific act is not a representation of a murderer. But what does logic have to do with it? When someone is revered, humans tend to be very

Better than all the stupid American car commercials with dubstep. It fits the messaging and the market. Don't see the issue.

Yeah it's a bit silly. If I want to buy a game on console and pc (if it's on both) I have to pay twice. If I want to buy a portable smash bros and then the wii u version, I have to pay twice. If you're happy with the version of the game you had, just keep playing that. Would it be cool if these re-releases came at a

Did you give the monster a try? I played as the monster and had a similar experience - the teams just destroyed me every time.

Those cliches came from somewhere. What are you expecting, some new weird relationship problem? There is nothing new under the sun.

See, I'm the opposite. I always go for the best looking game that I can stand to play. Yes I DO want the highest AA option, thanks. Yes I DO want the ultra phsyx particle setting. No really I do, game, I know it will affect performance :)

They should actually organize it like a real project, and use it as a breeding ground for new ideas. Have them do 2-4 week hackathon sprint events like doublefine's amnesia fortnight, give everyone a chance (and a motivation) to explore things outside their normal skillset and share in what other people's jobs are

Two main problems. The first is that the player has some ability to inject their own viewpoints onto whatever your game is trying to say. If you try to say too much or too hard, the players refusal to go along can weaken the theme considerably. The second is that often the gameplay and cutscene portions of the game

Two main problems. The first is that the player has some ability to inject their own viewpoints onto whatever your game is trying to say. If you try to say too much or too hard, the players refusal to go along can weaken the theme considerably. The second is that often the gameplay and cutscene portions of the game

I'm just going to ignore curators for now. Love most of the other changes, but even if that were working better I'm not to hot on it.

I have to agree with this. When a "soft no" is a "yes" that's not a soft no.

In general yes, in the case where someone is may be catfishing you it's yet another red flag. People who aren't so online are much more likely to want to meet in person.

I'm all for better refunds, though crappy refund policy is not really anything new with games. It's been going on since at least the 80s. (I wasn't around before then...)

There are some great "VNs" on pc - but most of them are actually VNs rather than adventure games with some VN style presentation.

Came here to say this. It has been a while since mgs2 though.

Of course they are entitled. They are entitled because they have grown up as sony fans and are used to getting basically the best treatment by everybody. They may be spoiled, but that's because they have been treated really really well. It really stands out when they are brushed off to the side, and companies that do

Survey's cost money. Of course they used the survey results to inform decisions about what to do. Since we only can see the survey questions and not how people answered them, we don't know what signals were sent. For instance, the mortar probably got high marks, hence it's return; while fire barrels likely got low

*Reads headline*