But....But...But the Christiunts shouldn’t have to care about the rights & freedoms of sexually active unmarried women because they feel that what they’re doing is immoral! Think of all the modestly dressed women at home who would love to have up all these children. It’s disrespectful, and the single ladies getting…

Don’t you love it when this kind of shit comes from our fellow women? Mix sexual jealousy with internalized misogyny and victim-blaming and voila! You’ll get women to do the oppressing right along with the men.

That would explain all the craggy sex-negative white feminists and republican women who live to hate Beyonce (a celebrity who doesn’t even talk!) and, by extension, Blue Ivy, but fawn over someone like Pink.

It’s the fact that this is another case of sex-negative misogynists using #Metoo and ‘feminist’ rhetoric to push their Return 2 Modesty agenda, and Walmart is bowing down.

We don’t know for a fact who is or isn’t one of Dan Schneider’s victims yet. I don’t think that little girl is his though.

Because so far the Dan Schneider stuff has been just “Let’s slut-shame/ carelessly attach destructive narratives to women/ young girls we don’t know without having the facts. It’s just harmless gossip!” internet speculation. No allegations. Sadly, as we saw from what happened with Weinstein, every single woman and…

I don’t believe he fathered Jamie Lynn’s baby because that kid looks just like the baby daddy and nothing like Dan Schneider. There’s a need to be careful with this because nobody has accused him of sexual abuse yet-so far it’s just internet speculation but no allegations. It’s possible that he did victimize someone,…

All in all this was the one dbs saga that was actually good. The return of Trunks saga was a hot mess, between the way they ruined his story and the non-canon way they paired him with freaking MAI instead of creating a new young saiyan girl for that role. (The English dub of this fauxmance is currently making me…

Yep. For some, #IBelieveHer seems to only work one way. Believe a woman if she reveals that she’s been abused, but automatically dismiss a woman as a liar if she reveals that she hasn’t been sexually abused based on her choices with her body. Because feminism, or something. Anything to protect that abrahamic…

Ok but you do realize that a feminist being ‘pro-porn’ is not about being a Cool Girl, right? The idea that the answer to rape culture and inequality is women Just Saying No to slutty things like porn, hookup culture, and revealing clothes is actually the dominant opinion in most spaces. Women who are critical of this…

..Which makes it a lot more accurate than random stranger just assuming (based on prejudice and armchair diagnosis, of course) that someone’s choice is a symptom of sexual abuse.

Do you realize that the (false) statement you just made is victim-blaming?

That idea expressed by your friend or whoever the woman was comes from a mixture of both victim-blaming (the idea that male sexual violence is caused by exposure to female immodesty) and the myth that ‘slutty’ behavior in a woman is always the result of sexual abuse. There are people who say the same thing about gays,…

I mean pop stars, actresses, and politicians have got to have bodyguards for some reason, right?

Just ignore this pompous gaslighting fauxminist and her little sidekick ‘LadyGreyEternal’. Their heads are too far up their porcelain Susan Brownmiller asses for them to understand why shutting down a conversation about discrimination and abuse with “But the victims are being sexually immoralz! They’re fucking with my…

All this does is trivialize real sexual violence and harassment by playing into the trope about women being too hysterical to tell the difference between abuse and sexuality we find cringeworthy. Bad timing.

Yes, Good Girl really needs your coddling right now. Nothing’s more painful than being a self-proclaimed ‘radical feminist’ who gets impolitely criticized for acting like a selfish Christian white woman in a discussion about abuse. The fact that you see nothing wrong with her equating the disrespect of her man paying…

The OP made it clear that it’s not just the actual sex she has a problem with though- she has an issue with the skin on display and the dances.

I wouldn’t even bother engaging any further with this second wave neo-victorian White Feminist narcissist if I were you. Rational, progressive dialogue is not possible with this arrogant, entitled little SWERF because she’s too self-centered, vapid, and insecure to see that her man looking at a woman who isn’t her is…

So then I guess you think men like Channing Tatum are Peak Shitty because many of the women (and let’s face it, men too) whom he’s allowed to ogle him for money over the years were in relationships, right? FFS, the fact that you and another chick think visual monogamy in your romantic relationships is more important…