saintheartwing
SaintHeartwing
saintheartwing

The ADL looked into that, him taking a photo was just a photo op his lawyer set up, and his lawyer used to be Lin Wood. That nutjob? Whom he dropped? He himself doesn’t actually have far right views. And you literally just went “whatever he did previously was irrelevant”...and then cited stuff Kyle did previously as

Excuse me, but last time I checked, it was fine to look into Rittenhouse’s supposed past as proof of his wrongdoing, why do you not want to do that for Rosenbaum? Either it’s okay for both of them or neither. 

He’s not brandishing it at anybody, you’re cherry picking one moment from a photo when there’s nobody else he’s in front of and could be brandishing it at.

Rosenbaum’s own girlfriend admitted he was off his meds, and unlike Rittenhouse, Rosenbaum had a record. So it’s reasonable to make that assumption vs somebody who’d never had a record before this. Also, Rittenhouse is the victim cuz it was a self-defense case. If they didn’t want this to happen, they shouldn’t have

There’s no proof he provoked anybody, and the law says that if you’re retreating and trying to avoid conflict, you regain a right to self defense. Since Rittenhouse was literally running away constantly in every single video we see of him, that shows he’s not looking for a fight, he isn’t brandishing a gun at folks,

There’s literally no evidence he’s a racist. 

to display all or part of the firearm, or otherwise make the presence of the firearm known to another person, in order to intimidate that person,” There’s no evidence he was doing that, just having a gun strapped to his back alone is not brandishing. 

Except there’s no evidence that he pointed his gun at Rosenbaum? So Rosenbaum had no right to attack or disarm him. 

That’s a nice pivot from the actual point. Rosenbaum attacked him first when all Rittenhouse had done was clean stuff up. That is not a good reason to assault a seventeen year old, let alone one who’s armed. Considering Rosenbaum was a convicted screwer of kids, he had no legal or ethical right to take the gun, doubly

Except he didn’t, it’s just him trash talking to a friend and trying to sound tough. Also, literally no proof he’s a fascist. Even the ADL couldn’t prove that. https://www.adl.org/media/15825/download

But it’s not self-defense, that person hasn’t attacked YOU, do you not get what “self” means? If somebody tries to attack you and steal your guy or wallet you have a legal and moral right to defend yourself.

He wasn’t an active shooter. He hadn’t shot anybody. Rosenbaum chased him first when all Kyle had done was clean up graffiti, walk around with a rifle on his back, and put out a dumpster fire or two.

People robbing a store is no reason now? 

Assumptions are a bad way to handle this case, we should deal with the facts. Not hypotheticals. Also, he had a legal right to protest, and yes, to have a gun. Second and first amendment. The same way, say, people in Koreatown during the Rodney King riots had a right to defend their places when stuff was being burned

Except that’s not true, he didn’t admit to wanting to shoot protestors. You didn’t watch the video. “It looks like one of them has a weapon,” Rittenhouse asserts in the video. “Bro, I wish I had my effining AR. l’d start shooting rounds at them.” They weren’t protestors. They were armed and hooded looters racing out

Except he didn’t murder them, it was self-defense because they attacked him first. You can’t just try to steal somebody’s gun. And the others had no legal or moral right to go after him because he’d only been defending himself from somebody who attacked him first. Save that stuff for the cops to decide

Because he was bipolar and off his meds. Rittenhouse wasn’t pointing his gun at him or chasing HIM around that night, it was Rosenbaum doing that. And he was a grown man harassing and chasing after a seventeen year old. And that’s before we get into Rosenbaum’s record, evidently he did stuff to little boys, meaning

Not really. Manslaughter is killing somebody when aggressively provoked. Like if your child was being tortured and you draw your gun and shoot the torturer in the back of the head, even though he didn’t know you were there. Self-defense is different. You have to keep showing you don’t want to fight. Considering Kyle

For one, every single person Rittenhouse shot was white, he didn’t express anti-black sentiments before the shooting, and ADL looked into him. No proof of white supremacist views. https://www.adl.org/media/15825/download

That’s not how protests work, we have a second amendment that says you can go to a protest with a gun. There’s plenty of states that have open carry. Kenosha was in one such state. It’s legal and perfectly reasonable. Conservatives believe it’s a fundamental right and it’s not because they wanna kill folks, it’s cuz