sadpanda1235
SadPanda1235
sadpanda1235

Heroine Quest is amazing if you liked the old Sierra Quest for Glory games.

I don't understand the relevance?

1.) None of what you said is related to the point I was making. It is making another point entirely, which is fine.

Yes, though again, I am not disputing you are correct on that.

I agree. That is also not a claim I am making. I am stating that it is incorrect to suggest that being defined by a traumatic event is not something that happens to male superheroes. It is an event that defines a large number of super heroes (batman, spiderman, the punisher, etc).

1.) that is a separate point that I don't disagree with (hence the 99%)

So like Spiderman?

Which as a separate point I agree with (hence the 99% of points). Having a superhero not being able to get over a traumatic event doesn't mean they need to be drawn crying in the face of danger.

While your argument against the comic book cover is logical on 99% of points:

Something that seems to be forgotten in the article:

Lots of animals kill for fun, putting aside cats and dolphins...

Animals eat any food source they can get. They don't think about if they have enough nutrients just "I can eat that, so I will". Deer also love baby squirrels and sometimes you'll see them eat roadkill. Cows, goats, and sheep love barn kittens as well.

Says the self centred self important eugenics loving nazi piece of garbage who thinks that somehow we need an even bigger population, as long as they are his kids passing on his genes. How many billions of people do you think we need?

Well I don't want to have children, but I do want to travel the world. I don't really want to live in a society that tells me my prime value is being a baby machine.

It all depends on who "The rest" is. The people in charge of the corporatocracies are not some different species. They are what happens when anyone is in control. The problem isn't the structure of government its the structure of people. A structure of government is just how the people with guns and resources tell

That is a problem in logic. Corporations are literally arms of the government. They are agencies that exist by government authorization to carry out essential operations and in exchange none of the individuals involved are on the hook for the actions of the corporation (The invisible wall). Calling them private

Social Control and Fairer Distribution of Resources are opposite each other. I know people in the US draw a line between fiscal and social policy, but it doesn't really exist. Social control is exercised through fiscal means. Fiscal means are largely controlled by social control. Any social ill has a fiscal cause

Also funny how the problem was the 1%, until someone pointed out that worldwide the middle class here was the 1%. Then the problem became the 1% of the 1%, the people who were richer than us. We being equally wealthier than other people suffering are not the problem in the world. We didn't need to suffer ourselves.

I don't want to embolden the crowd who feels they need a .357 magnum walking around suburban Des Moines,

You just need one person to think where before you needed hundreds. Physical automation didn't remove physical labour, it just meant you only need one mechanic instead of a hundred factory workers. Likewise you will have one developer instead of a hundred clerks.